View Single Post
  #9  
Old April 14th, 2008, 10:41 AM
hatsoff hatsoff is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 225
Country:
Thanks: 52
Thanked 61 Times in 59 Posts
hatsoff will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainBlack View Post
And of course we have:

\bar{N}=\sum_{r=1}^{\infty} r~ (1-p)^{r-1}p = \frac{1}{p}=n

Which we could deduce from more general principles but its nice to see the series summed anyway.

RonL
Thank you. This helps a great deal. I see clearly now that I was mistaken, and I see where and why. However, though I do not doubt your conclusion, neither do I understand how you reached it. I therefore have a couple more questions...

Firstly, how did you get from here:

\sum_{r=1}^{\infty} r~ (1-p)^{r-1}p

to here:

\frac{1}{p}

? Also, would you be able to explain in newbie terms how you got this initial formula:

\bar{N}=\sum_{r=1}^{\infty} r~ p(r)

?

Thanks for all your help so far!
Reply With Quote