View Single Post
  #7  
Old November 23rd, 2008, 02:01 AM
Moo's Avatar
Moo Moo is offline
A Cute Angle
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: P(I'm here)=1/3, P(I'm there)=t+1/3
Posts: 5,051
Country:
Thanks: 506
Thanked 2,916 Times in 2,399 Posts
Moo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by galactus View Post
For goodness sake, why didn't you say that in the first place?. That makes all the difference. It's the second fundamental rule of calc. There is no need to laboriously find the integral.

Is this what it is:

\frac{d}{dx}\left[\int_{a}^{x}f(t)dt\right]=f(x)

For instance, \frac{d}{dx}\left[\int_{1}^{x}\frac{sin(t)}{t}dt\right]=\frac{sin({\color{red}x})}{{\color{red}x}}

Remember that \int_{a}^{x}f(t)dt=-\int_{x}^{a}f(t)dt
Just being picky



To the OP : why isn't there sin(1) ?
Imagine that F is an antiderivative of your function f.

We know that \int_a^x f(t) ~ dt=F(x)-F(a)

But a is a constant with respect to x. So F(a) is a constant too.
Hence when differentiating, you'll only have F'(x), which is exactly f(x)
__________________
Everything is possible. The impossible just takes longer.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

shinhidora production

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote