View Single Post
  #2  
Old November 27th, 2008, 03:29 PM
Mathstud28's Avatar
Mathstud28 Mathstud28 is offline
MHF Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,664
Country:
Thanks: 430
Thanked 1,058 Times in 959 Posts
Mathstud28 is a splendid one to beholdMathstud28 is a splendid one to beholdMathstud28 is a splendid one to beholdMathstud28 is a splendid one to beholdMathstud28 is a splendid one to beholdMathstud28 is a splendid one to beholdMathstud28 is a splendid one to beholdMathstud28 is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to Mathstud28
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmccormick View Post
Consider the function

f(s) = \sum_{r=1} ^ {\infty} \frac{1}{r^s}.
I have so far managed to show that the series converges for each s\in\ (1,{\infty}) and that this series defines a continuous function f : (1,{\infty}) \rightarrow\mathbb{R}. I am however struggling to show that:

(i) f is differentiable and that f'(s) < 0 for all s \in\ (1,{\infty}).
(ii) f is differentiable and that f''(s) > 0 for all s \in\ (1,{\infty}).

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
thanks
Note that on the specified interval that \zeta(x) converges uniformly on (1,\infty) since those points are on the interior of its interval of convergence. Now note that \frac{1}{r^x} is differentiable to \frac{-x}{r^{x+1}} and that by the Weirstrass test or using the ratio/root test that this is uniformly convergent on (0,\infty) we can conclude that

\forall{x}\in(1,\infty)~\zeta'(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{-x}{r^{x+1}}

Now it is obvious that \forall{x}\in(1,\infty)~\frac{-x}{r^{x+1}}<0, so there is part i and for part two repeat a similar process of establishing, uniform convergence of \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{-x}{r^{x+1}} on (1,\infty), uniform convergence of \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{x(x+1)}{r^{x+2}} on (1,\infty), and the differentiability of \frac{-x}{r^{x+1}} on (1,\infty)
Reply With Quote
The following users thank Mathstud28 for this useful post:
Donate to MHF