View Single Post
  #4  
Old November 27th, 2008, 07:05 PM
Mathstud28's Avatar
Mathstud28 Mathstud28 is offline
MHF Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,656
Country:
Thanks: 430
Thanked 1,061 Times in 961 Posts
Mathstud28 is a splendid one to beholdMathstud28 is a splendid one to beholdMathstud28 is a splendid one to beholdMathstud28 is a splendid one to beholdMathstud28 is a splendid one to beholdMathstud28 is a splendid one to beholdMathstud28 is a splendid one to beholdMathstud28 is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to Mathstud28
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmccormick View Post
I feel really stupid because your explanation is very clear but I don't follow....can you please explain why the derivative of \frac{1}{r^x} is \frac{-x}{r^{x+1}} because I make it out to be -r^{-x}ln(r). The second thing is the ratio test on \frac{-x}{r^{x+1}} gives convergence, does that necessarily imply uniform convergence.
Sorry about this and thanks a lot
Because \zeta(x) is a function of x so \zeta'(x)=\frac{d}{dx}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{r^x} now since the appropriate conditions were met as I showed you \frac{d}{dx}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{r^x}=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{d}{dx}\frac{1}{r^x}=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{-x}{r^{x+1}}. And to answer your other question, I mistyped, forgive me. Disregard the ratio/root test comment and stick the Weirstrass M-test.
Reply With Quote