View Single Post
  #11  
Old November 28th, 2008, 07:30 AM
Opalg's Avatar
Opalg Opalg is offline
MHF Contributor

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 2,063
Country:
Thanks: 126
Thanked 1,258 Times in 1,046 Posts
Opalg has a brilliant futureOpalg has a brilliant futureOpalg has a brilliant futureOpalg has a brilliant futureOpalg has a brilliant futureOpalg has a brilliant futureOpalg has a brilliant futureOpalg has a brilliant futureOpalg has a brilliant futureOpalg has a brilliant futureOpalg has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmccormick View Post
For the Weierstrass M-test what series do we use to show that -\sum_{r=1}^{\infty}\frac{\ln r}{r^s} and \sum_{r=1}^{\infty}\frac{(\ln r)^2}{r^s} respectively are uniformly convergent.
These series are uniformly convergent on the interval [a,∞), for any given a>1. In fact, \frac{(\ln r)^k}{r^s} is decreasing as a function of s, because its derivative is -\frac{(\ln r)^{k+1}}{r^s}. So its maximum value on the interval [a,∞) is its value at the left endpoint s=a, and we take M_r = \frac{(\ln r)^k}{r^a} (where k = 1 or 2 as appropriate) in the M-test. The fact that \sum_{r=1}^\infty \frac{(\ln r)^k}{r^a} converges (for a>1) then tells you that these series converge uniformly on that interval.

But note that uniform convergence on the interval [a,∞) for every a>1 does not imply uniform convergence on the interval (1,∞); and in fact the Riemann zeta series is not uniformly convergent on (1,∞).
Reply With Quote
The following users thank Opalg for this useful post:
Donate to MHF