View Single Post
  #3  
Old January 6th, 2009, 05:59 AM
HallsofIvy HallsofIvy is offline
MHF Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 328
Thanked 1,214 Times in 1,115 Posts
HallsofIvy has much to be proud ofHallsofIvy has much to be proud ofHallsofIvy has much to be proud ofHallsofIvy has much to be proud ofHallsofIvy has much to be proud ofHallsofIvy has much to be proud ofHallsofIvy has much to be proud ofHallsofIvy has much to be proud ofHallsofIvy has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caity View Post
A retailer spent $48 to purchase a number of special mugs. Two of them were broken in the store, but by selling each of the remaining mugs for $3 above the original cost per mug, she made a total profit of $22.

Construct an equation that will allow us to solve for the number of mugs, denoted by n, that were originally purchased.

a) If the price for n mugs is $48, how can we express the cost per mug?

for this I got \frac{48}{n}
Yes, that is correct.

Quote:
b) We are told that the retailer, in order to make a specific profit, sells the remaining mugs for $3 more than the original cost per mug. Using this information, and your answer to step a), how can we represent the number of mugs that are available for sale?

for this I got \frac{48}{n} +3
You said in a that \frac{48}{n} was a cost per mug and the only "3" in the problem is the selling price $3 per mug. So "\frac{48}{n}+ 3 must have units of "dollars per mug". That cannot be the number of mugs!

But it doesn't make sense that the question asked here is exactly the same as the question asked in (c)! Did you mis-copy the question? If the question was "what price did he sell the mugs for", then your answer is correct.

Quote:
c) Since two of the mugs were broken in the store, how can we represent the number of mugs that are available for sale?

for this I got n - 2 but not sure about it....
Well, of course! If you start with n things and "remove" 2 of them, you have n-2 left.

Quote:
d) Use your answers from steps b) and c) to construct and expression for the amount of money made on the sale of the remaining mugs.

for this I have n(\frac{48}{n} +3) - 6
You answer to (b) was \frac{48}{n}+ 3 dollars per mug and to (c) was n- 2 mugs. If you multiply those you get "dollars" as you want. But (n-2)(\frac{48}{n}+ 3) is NOT n(\frac{48}{n}+ 3)- 6. You have to multiply the "-2" by \frac{48}{n} as well as by 3. And you have to multiply the "n" by 3 as well as [LaTeX Error: Syntax error].
(n-2)(\frac{48}{n}+ 3)= n(\frac{48}{n})+ 3n- 2\frac{48}{n}- 6
= 42+ 3n- \frac{96}{n}

[/quote]e) The profit on the mugs can be found by subtracting the cost fo the mugs from the amount of money made on the sale of the mugs. Write an equation that states this relationship between the money made, the cost, and the profit.

dont know how to do this one...
The mugs cost a total of $48 so the profit, $12, is the money in (d) minus 48:
42+ 3n- 2\frac{48}{n}- 48= 12
3n- \frac{96}{n}- 18= 0

The real problem is

Rewrite the equation that you wrote up in step e) in the standard form of a quadratic equation and show your work:[/quote]
Since the equation above involves an n in the denominator, multiply every term in the equation by n:
3n^2- 18n- 96= 0
or, dividing through by 3,
n^2- 6n- 32= 0

[/quote]Problem

Solve the quadratic equation an answer the following questions.
1. How many mugs were purchased?
2. What was the origina cost per mug?
3. What profit was made on each mug?
4. When solving a quadratic equation, there are normally two solutions. Why were you able to discard one of the solutions in this case?[/quote]

Now that you have the right equation, try these yourself.
Reply With Quote
The following users thank HallsofIvy for this useful post:
Donate to MHF