View Single Post
  #3  
Old January 12th, 2009, 03:06 AM
ArixII ArixII is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3
Country:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ArixII is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurent View Post
It seems to be simply a consequence of {\rm Var}(\lambda X)=\lambda^2{\rm Var}(X), which is easily seen from the definition of the variance.

So the variance of X=0.005 A is {\rm Var}(X)=0.005^2 {\rm Var}(A)=0.005^2\cdot 0.2^2.


Again, this is in fact quite simple, and very specific to your setting: you have X=\lambda A from above, and V=\mu A where \lambda=0.005 and \mu=0.1 (with appropriate units), so that {\rm Cov}(X,V)=E[(X-E[X])(V-E[V])]=E[\lambda(A-E[A])\mu(A-E[A])]=\lambda\mu E[(A-E[A])^2]=\lambda\mu{\rm Var}(A)=\sqrt{\lambda^2{\rm Var}(A)}\sqrt{\mu^2{\rm Var}(A)}=\sqrt{{\rm Var}(X)}\sqrt{{\rm Var}(V)}=\sigma(X)\sigma(V).

I hope I'm right, I didn't try to understand the physics beneath. The whole thing relies on the way proportional quantities behave for the variance/covariance.
Thank you!! It helped me to understand )
Reply With Quote