
January 12th, 2009, 03:06 AM
|
| Newbie | | Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3
Country: Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurent It seems to be simply a consequence of  , which is easily seen from the definition of the variance.
So the variance of  is  .
Again, this is in fact quite simple, and very specific to your setting: you have  from above, and  where  and  (with appropriate units), so that ![{\rm Cov}(X,V)=E[(X-E[X])(V-E[V])] {\rm Cov}(X,V)=E[(X-E[X])(V-E[V])]](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/391336a137a8cc04d888fb51c2c13c14-1.gif) ![=E[\lambda(A-E[A])\mu(A-E[A])]=\lambda\mu E[(A-E[A])^2] =E[\lambda(A-E[A])\mu(A-E[A])]=\lambda\mu E[(A-E[A])^2]](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/264d683e0e09058baf059548e2e27359-1.gif)   .
I hope I'm right, I didn't try to understand the physics beneath. The whole thing relies on the way proportional quantities behave for the variance/covariance. | Thank you!! It helped me to understand ) |