OK, let's run this past the General and see if it salutes.
Suppose that

commutes with all

. Assume that

and choose any

with

. Clearly

.
Claim: The set

is linearly dependent.
Assume for contradiction purposes that

and

are linearly independent. Then so are

and

.
The linearly independent sets

can each be extended to a basis.
Therefore there exists an invertible matrix

with

and

.
But then

which shows that

and

are linearly dependent after all, contradiction.
Therefore

is l.d. and there must exist a non-zero scalar

such that

.
For any non-zero

there is an invertible matrix

such that

.
Therefore

.
Thus

which means that

.