Thread
:
Mathematical Induction
View Single Post
#
10
July 8th, 2009, 02:27 AM
Grandad
MHF Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Coast of England
Posts: 1,659
Country:
Thanks: 111
Thanked 928 Times in 808 Posts
Modular arithmetic
Hello matsci0000
Quote:
Originally Posted by
matsci0000
Thanks Grandad for the proof but I do not know anything about modulus and its operations.Is there any other alternate solution for this?
Yes. The modular arithmetic notation I used is a convenient way of discussing remainders when one integer is divided by another. But instead of using the mod notation, we can write the proof out as follows (it just looks a bit more complicated, that's all).
In the proof that follows,
are integers.
. Call this equation (1)
If we now replace
by
in this equation we get:
Therefore if
is not a multiple of
, then
isn't either.
So, provided
and
are not multiples of
, we have sufficient to show that
is not a multiple of
for all integers
.
leaves a remainder
when divided by
.
leaves a remainder
, for
(using equation (1) with
)
leaves a remainder
, for
, when divided by
.
That completes the proof.
Grandad
The following users thank Grandad for this useful post:
matsci0000
Grandad
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Grandad
Find all posts by Grandad
Arcade
Challenge
Grandad
in the Arcade!