September 24th, 2009, 11:25 PM
|
 | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 13,490
Country:  Thanks: 2,974
Thanked 5,249 Times in 4,598 Posts
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by spearfish  ok, so if I multiply them the first multiple would be 4*6*7 = 168. However, 84 is a common multiple of 4,6, and 7, so it seems this doesn't do the trick. Or am I missing something? | Since  , any common multiples of  will be a multiple of 4, 6 and 7.
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti)
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|