View Single Post
  #3  
Old November 4th, 2009, 10:05 AM
aman_cc aman_cc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 484
Thanks: 160
Thanked 86 Times in 81 Posts
aman_cc will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clic-clac View Post
If you've never used the fact that N_1 and N_2 were normal subgroups:

S_3 is a group of order 6, it contains an element of order 2 and another one of order 3, which of course generate subgroups of orders 2 and 3.
But S_3 is not cyclic...

The hypothesis "N_1,N_2 normal" allows you to prove \text{order}(ab)=pq, for instance, consider the commutator [a,b]=aba^{-1}b^{-1} and prove it is the identity element, that will mean a,b commute and then you will be able to conclude \text{order}(ab)=pq.
Absolutely. Thanks very much. I missed the fact that to prove order(ab)=pq, I am implicitly using the fact that the sub-groups are normal.
Thanks again !!
Reply With Quote