View Single Post
  #4  
Old November 4th, 2009, 04:57 PM
Drexel28's Avatar
Drexel28 Drexel28 is offline
MHF Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,899
Country:
Thanks: 74
Thanked 560 Times in 522 Posts
Drexel28 is a name known to allDrexel28 is a name known to allDrexel28 is a name known to allDrexel28 is a name known to allDrexel28 is a name known to allDrexel28 is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmoney90 View Post
No, the cosets are the easy part lol, I just wanted to make sure I was correct in my assumption that I only need to work out 2 cases (3 possible variations, and 1 of them is my subgroup H). I was just validating that I can be lazy rather than work out all 12 possible cosets
Haha, what is the point of theorems and corrolarys if you can't be a little lazy?

But think about it. We know that the relation which describes the concept of a coset (specifically a\sim b\Longleftrightarrow a^{-1}b\in H for left and a\sim b \Longleftrightarrow ab^{-1}\in H for right) is an equivalence relation. So it partitions G. So you'll know your done finding cosets when they've exhausted the elements of G
Reply With Quote
The following users thank Drexel28 for this useful post:
Donate to MHF