View Single Post
  #11  
Old November 4th, 2009, 09:42 PM
jmoney90 jmoney90 is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 22
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
jmoney90 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drexel28 View Post
An isomorphism? I think not. What binary operation were you supposing of defining on \mathcal{L}\left(H\right),\mathcal{R}\left(H\right)? But a bijection, yes.

So we can conclude that \text{card }\mathcal{L}\left(H\right)=\text{card }\mathcal{R}\left(H\right)

To see this another way, you can easily show that \Psi:H\mapsto Ha is a bijection. Or equivalently that Lagranges theorem is equally applicable to right cosets. From this we can gather that

|H|\left[G:H\right]_{\text{Left}}=|G|=|H|\left[G:H\right]_{\text{Right}}

which equivalently shows that \text{card }\mathcal{L}\left(H\right)=\text{card }\mathcal{R}\left(H\right).
Oh, that is clever! I even noticed it was a bijection, just didn't make that connection lol. I guess I was really focused on the idea of an isomorphism
Reply With Quote