Thread: work - calculus
View Single Post
  #5  
Old November 1st, 2007, 10:08 AM
CaptainBlack's Avatar
CaptainBlack CaptainBlack is offline
Grand Panjandrum
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South of England
Posts: 11,379
Country:
Thanks: 667
Thanked 3,619 Times in 2,916 Posts
CaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kalagota View Post
we also that notation for vector fields, i.e. if we have a Field vector
F(x,y)
then it is equivalent to saying that
F(x,y) = <x,y>
Yes, but in this context who is the "we" you refer to?

That is what area of study uses this notation (I ask because it is not used
in any thing I have studies in this way).

RonL
__________________
Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.

Giordano Bruno
Reply With Quote