View Single Post
  #3  
Old December 7th, 2007, 12:32 AM
lmao6 lmao6 is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8
Country:
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
lmao6 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soroban View Post
Hello, polymerase!


I agree with your answer . . . {\color{blue}\text{b) unde{f}ined}}

f\left(\frac{1}{e}\right) \:=\:\ln\left[\ln\left(\frac{1}{e}\right)\right] \;=\;\ln\left[\ln\left(e^{-1}\right)\right] \;=\;\ln(-1) .??

The function does not exist at that point, so neither does its derivative.
Hello, I did this and used Maple to confirm. Finding the derivative of this double ln first:
ln(ln(x)) = 1/ln(x) * 1/x
now you sub in (1/e)
1/ln(1/e) = 1/ln(e^-1) noting that.. ln (e^x) = x
so = 1/ln(e^-1) = 1/-1 * 1/(1/e)
so multiply the reciprical since your dividing by a fraction and your final answer is -e!
Im pretty sure im right, and im matching the answer of your 20 years experience prof :P
Reply With Quote