Thread: Confusing mathematicians
View Single Post
  #12  
Old December 27th, 2007, 10:52 AM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
ThePerfectHacker ThePerfectHacker is offline
Global Moderator

  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country:
Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,758 Times in 3,070 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by colby2152 View Post
Two of the greatest mathematicians have very similar names: Euler and Euclid.
Not so confusing.

Quote:
Galileo, Galois
Galileo was not a mathematician. And this is not confusing.
Quote:
Schroder, Schrodinger
Schrodinger was not a mathematician. And I never even heard of Schroder, was he a quantum theorist? Probably also not a mathematician. This is definitely not confusing.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain power
over people is to assure the people that they are ruling
themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully
submissive slaves." - Joseph Sobran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote