Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > University Math Help > Advanced Applied Math
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 22nd, 2009, 04:16 AM
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 736
Country:
Thanks: 54
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
transgalactic has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default is my solution correct ..

here is a question:
http://i25.tinypic.com/8xlcfl.gif
there is endless wire uniformly charged \lambda=2*10^{-4}C/m
and close to it located a wire with l=0.12_m
which has 30 degree angle between him and the endless wire,and it charged in uniformed way so that the total charge on it is q=3*10^{-9}
the distance of the finite wire and the infinite wire is 0.08 meters

A.find the total force acted on the finite wire.
B.find it when \alpha=0degrees and when \alpha=90degrees.

gaus law for infinite wire i presume its length is l and distance r.
E2\pi r h=\frac{q}{\epsilon_0}\\
E=\frac{q}{\epsilon_0 2\pi r h}=\frac{\lambda h}{\epsilon_0 2\pi r h}=\frac{\lambda }{\epsilon_0 2\pi r }\\
\frac{q_2}{l_2}=\lambda_2\\
l_0=l_2\cos \alpha\\
\int_{0}^{l_0}Edl=\int_{0}^{l_0}\frac{\lambda }{\epsilon_0 2\pi r }dl

i sum along the finite wire
but the ditance from the infinite changes too.
so it should be a double integral
but its not a 2d body

??

Last edited by transgalactic; August 22nd, 2009 at 04:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old August 23rd, 2009, 06:21 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 51
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Haytham is on a distinguished road
Default

you are right, if its a 1 dimensional body you will need only 1 integral

but you also have to find out the relation of r with l.


hint:
if you draw a xy coordinate axis (parallel and perpendicular to the infinite wire), you can do it

then
dl=\sqrt{dx^2+dy^2}
dl=\sqrt{(\frac{dx}{dx})^2+(\frac{dy}{dx})^2}dx
dl=\sqrt{1+(\frac{dy}{dx})^2}dx
and you got a 1d integral
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 23rd, 2009, 11:57 AM
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 736
Country:
Thanks: 54
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
transgalactic has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

i cant use expression using dx and dy
because thus i wil have a double integral

i need to link l with r
r=0.08+(temporary hipotenuse)*cos alpha

i dont know how to express this temporary hipotenuse
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 24th, 2009, 03:25 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 51
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Haytham is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transgalactic View Post
i cant use expression using dx and dy
because thus i wil have a double integral
no.
its not dx and dy. its dx and \frac{dy}{dx}.


Imagine these axis. y-axis parallel the infinite wire. x-axis perpendicular.
that way r will simply be x.

now you need to integrate dl, as you wrote in the end of your 1st post. but you need to write dl into a function of dx.




notice the 90º angle triangle, you use





now you just need to find the wire equation
y=mx+b
calculate \frac{dy}{dx} and you get dl in terms of dx.

Then substitute dl in your equation.
Actually your equation isnt entirely correct (Ithink)

F=E q
so you need to use
dF=E \times dq
dF=E \times \lambda_2 \times dl
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 24th, 2009, 07:27 AM
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 736
Country:
Thanks: 54
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
transgalactic has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

i cant find
y=mx+b

m=dy/dx
but b cannot be found
i dont have enough data to know where the line crosses x axes

??
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 24th, 2009, 07:32 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 51
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Haytham is on a distinguished road
Default



m is all you need
you only need dy/dx so find out m
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old August 24th, 2009, 08:21 AM
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 736
Country:
Thanks: 54
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
transgalactic has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

my expestion is correct because its F=dq*E

and we substitute dl by an expression of dx
but i cant express dy only with dx
\int_{0}^{l_0}Edl=\int_{0}^{xpretion}\frac{\lambda }{\epsilon_0 2\pi r }\sqrt{1+(\frac{dy}{dx})^2}dx
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old August 24th, 2009, 08:30 AM
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 736
Country:
Thanks: 54
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
transgalactic has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

i dont know how to express dy/dx using only dx
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old August 24th, 2009, 09:39 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 51
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Haytham is on a distinguished road
Default

y=mx+b

if you derive that in relation to x

\frac{dy}{dx}=m

you look to the line and you see its 0.12m long and makes 30º with vertical, so
the x component of the line, \Delta x, is
\Delta x=0.12 \times sin(30)=0.06 m

the y component of the line, \Delta y, is
\Delta y=0.12 \times cos(30)=0.06 \sqrt 3 m

m=\frac{\Delta y}{\Delta x}=\sqrt 3

\frac{dy}{dx}=\sqrt 3



Quote:
my expestion is correct because its F=dq*E

and we substitute dl by an expression of dx
but i cant express dy only with dx
I don't understand.
if you say F=dq*E, why do you use in the integral E dl.
If you are calculating the Force you need to use E dq.

Note that nowhere in your expression the electric charge of the finite line is included. And the force clearly depends on that charge.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old August 24th, 2009, 12:34 PM
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 736
Country:
Thanks: 54
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
transgalactic has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

E=\frac{\lambda }{\epsilon_0 2\pi r }\\
\int_{0}^{0.12}Edq=\int_{0}^{0.12}\frac{\lambda^2\sqrt{1+3}dx }{\epsilon_0 2\pi r }=\int_{0.08}^{0.08+0.06 \sqrt 3}\frac{\lambda^22dx }{\epsilon_0 2\pi r }=\int_{0.08}^{0.08+0.06 \sqrt 3}\frac{\lambda^22dx }{\epsilon_0 2\pi x }

correct?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old August 24th, 2009, 04:48 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 51
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Haytham is on a distinguished road
Default

it looks good

just use \lambda_1 \lambda_2 instead of \lambda^2, because the wires have different values.

and the integration limit should be
\int_{0.08}^{0.08+0.06}
because its l \times sin(30)
Reply With Quote
The following users thank Haytham for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
  #12  
Old August 24th, 2009, 05:28 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 143
Country:
Thanks: 8
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
luobo will become famous soon enough
Default

According to the figure, the distance from the center of the finite wire to the infinite wire is x_0. Integrate along the finite wire,

F=\int_{-\tfrac{l}{2}}^{+\tfrac{l}{2}} \frac{\lambda}{2\pi \epsilon_0 (x_0+x\sin\alpha)} \ \frac{q}{l} \ dx = \frac{\lambda \ q}{2\pi \epsilon_0 l} \left(\frac{1}{\sin\alpha} \ln \frac{x_0+\frac{l}{2}\sin\alpha}{x_0-\frac{l}{2}\sin\alpha}\right)

Last edited by mr fantastic; September 18th, 2009 at 09:51 AM. Reason: Restored original reply
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old August 24th, 2009, 11:01 PM
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 736
Country:
Thanks: 54
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
transgalactic has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

thanks
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.