| 
October 28th, 2009, 10:35 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 30
Country: Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Cauchy Distribution Can I get help on the following HW question:
If X is a standard Cauchy Random Variable then 1/X is also a standard Cauchy Random Variable. How can it be proved?
Is it correct to say that: P(1/X<x) = P(X>1/x) = 1 - P(X<1/x) for x>0?
What about if x<0 | 
October 28th, 2009, 11:18 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 56
Thanks: 2
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
| | You seem to be on the right track. I would start with defining  , and begin with  , then take the derivative and see if you recognize it. | 
October 28th, 2009, 12:04 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 30
Country: Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Thanks a lot. But what I am not clear about is that Cauchy Dist is from -infinity to +infinity. So is it correct that 
both when y is positive and when y is negative. I would think that if y<0
then I should have P(Y<y) = P(1/X<y) = P(X<1/y) but then the derivative will
be negative??? | 
October 28th, 2009, 12:13 PM
|  | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,368
Country: Thanks: 99
Thanked 560 Times in 503 Posts
| | | 
October 28th, 2009, 01:26 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 56
Thanks: 2
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by matheagle | I'm not sure this works, since g(X) = 1/X is not monotone over the whole real line, and moreover is undefined for part of the support of X. The method DOES give the right answer, but I think if you are going to use it, you should handle to problem point X = 0. I think it's easier just to use work directly with the cdf. | 
October 28th, 2009, 01:31 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 56
Thanks: 2
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by thomas_donald Thanks a lot. But what I am not clear about is that Cauchy Dist is from -infinity to +infinity. So is it correct that 
both when y is positive and when y is negative. I would think that if y<0
then I should have P(Y<y) = P(1/X<y) = P(X<1/y) but then the derivative will
be negative??? | Taking the reciprocal reverses the ordering regardless of where you are on the real line; e.g. -4 < -3 and -1/4 > -1/3. | | The following users thank theodds for this useful post: | |  | 
October 28th, 2009, 02:10 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 30
Country: Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Thank you very much. Now I get it. | 
October 29th, 2009, 12:21 AM
|  | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,368
Country: Thanks: 99
Thanked 560 Times in 503 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by theodds I'm not sure this works, since g(X) = 1/X is not monotone over the whole real line, and moreover is undefined for part of the support of X. The method DOES give the right answer, but I think if you are going to use it, you should handle to problem point X = 0. I think it's easier just to use work directly with the cdf. |
I've never worried about a set of measure zero
and 1/x is decreasing for both x<0 and x>o, so that part is fine
This technique is just the derivative of the technique using F(x).
If you worry about it, just do one case at a time, x<0 and then x>0. | | The following users thank matheagle for this useful post: | |  | 
October 29th, 2009, 08:45 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 30
Country: Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Thank you very much for the help. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:20 AM. | | |
 | |  |