| 
November 4th, 2009, 05:29 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | desperate...moment generating function f(x)=3/64x^2(4-x)
what is the moment generating function?
how do i find the mean and variance?
any help would really be appreciated since i dont understand anything concerning this
thankx | 
November 4th, 2009, 05:55 PM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 170
Country: Thanks: 73
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by sasasa f(x)=3/64x^2(4-x)
what is the moment generating function?
how do i find the mean and variance?
any help would really be appreciated since i dont understand anything concerning this
thankx | Do you mean  ? | 
November 4th, 2009, 06:18 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 65
Thanks: 13
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
| | Var(x) =
MGF of f(X) =  so you'll have to integrate  over a certain region. | 
November 4th, 2009, 06:26 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 56
Thanks: 2
Thanked 20 Times in 19 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by statmajor MGF of f(X) =  so you'll have to integrate  over a certain region. | This is not right. The moment generating function is defined as
(for continuous distributions). I would help with the computation but I can't figure out what the density is supposed to be from the OP. | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to theodds For This Useful Post: | |  | 
November 4th, 2009, 06:27 PM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,237
Country: Thanks: 2,574
Thanked 4,760 Times in 4,192 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by sasasa f(x)=3/64x^2(4-x)
what is the moment generating function?
how do i find the mean and variance?
any help would really be appreciated since i dont understand anything concerning this
thankx | I assume you mean  . This pdf is incomplete as you do not include the interval over which this expression is defined (the support).
You should know that you need to calculate  (and I have not included the integral terminals since you did not completely define the pdf). So please show all your working and clearly state where you are stuck.
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
November 4th, 2009, 06:28 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 65
Thanks: 13
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
| | Darn, can't believe I wrote that. Thanks for correcting me.
But the other parts of my post should be right.
Thanks again.
Last edited by mr fantastic; November 4th, 2009 at 06:29 PM.
Reason: m --> r
| 
November 5th, 2009, 04:21 AM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Sorry (so many functions)… so overwhelmed that i even posted the wrong function. The right one is: f(x)=0.15e^(-0.15(x-0.5)), when x is bigger or equal to 0.5 Thanks again for all your precious help | 
November 5th, 2009, 05:01 AM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,237
Country: Thanks: 2,574
Thanked 4,760 Times in 4,192 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by sasasa Sorry (so many functions)… so overwhelmed that i even posted the wrong function. The right one is: f(x)=0.15e^(-0.15(x-0.5)), when x is bigger or equal to 0.5 Thanks again for all your precious help | Can you set up the required integral using the definition of the moment generating function? Can you do the integration? Please show all that you can do and say where you're stuck.
(And please use normal size font so that we don't have to use microscopes to read it).
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
November 5th, 2009, 03:13 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | this is what i got:
Mx(t)=(-0.15e^(0.5t))/(t-0.15) but i am not sure if it is right
Can you please tell me if this is right:
Mean=E(X)=Mx´(0)=7.166
thanks
Last edited by sasasa; November 5th, 2009 at 05:07 PM.
| 
November 6th, 2009, 02:03 PM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,237
Country: Thanks: 2,574
Thanked 4,760 Times in 4,192 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by sasasa this is what i got:
Mx(t)=(-0.15e^(0.5t))/(t-0.15) but i am not sure if it is right
Can you please tell me if this is right:
Mean=E(X)=Mx´(0)=7.166
thanks | Your mgf is OK: - Wolfram|Alpha
I assume at this level you can correctly differentiate and substitute t = 0. You can check your own answer using the definition of E(X): Calculate  .
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
November 9th, 2009, 09:25 AM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | i think the mean is right...
did you get 0,25 as the variance?
thanks for all your help | 
November 9th, 2009, 08:07 PM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,237
Country: Thanks: 2,574
Thanked 4,760 Times in 4,192 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by sasasa i think the mean is right...
did you get 0,25 as the variance?
thanks for all your help | I don't plan to do the calculation since you know how to answer the question. If you have found the correct values of E(X) and E(X^2) then your answer for Var(X) = E(X^2) - (E(X))^2 will probably be correct.
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
November 9th, 2009, 11:28 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 56
Thanks: 2
Thanked 20 Times in 19 Posts
| | The random variable looks like a member of the location family of an exponential, i.e. if Z ~ Exponential(1/.15), X = Z + .5. That should simplify checking your answer. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:51 PM. | | |