| 
November 15th, 2009, 05:48 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 34
Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
| | MLE Find the MLE of the unknown parameter  when  is a sample from the following distribution:
I have the following, not sure if it's correct.
Is this correct? | 
November 15th, 2009, 06:53 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 72
Thanks: 2
Thanked 25 Times in 24 Posts
| | Seems to me that maximizing the likelihood function of this guy is equivalent to minimizing  . The value that accomplishes this is a well known summary statistic, albeit not the sample mean. | | The following users thank theodds for this useful post: | |  | 
November 15th, 2009, 06:54 PM
|  | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,962
Country: Thanks: 127
Thanked 814 Times in 731 Posts
| | No the absolute value is around the Xi-theta
Use logic not calc here
You want to maximize  wrt theta
that the same as minimizing  wrt theta | | The following users thank matheagle for this useful post: | |  | 
November 15th, 2009, 11:35 PM
|  | A Cute Angle | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: P(I'm here)=1/3, P(I'm there)=t+1/3
Posts: 5,382
Country: Thanks: 525
Thanked 3,066 Times in 2,537 Posts
| | Hello,
Note that you can simplify the writing in latex : when there's a single element in the exponent or in the indice, you don't have to put { }
X_1, X_2, ... will produce the same result
__________________ Everything is possible. The impossible just takes longer. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
shinhidora production To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
- I hate, I can't stand, I abhor, I dislike, I disdain, I detest, I loathe, I despise and I am repelled by tousled birds of pray. | 
November 23rd, 2009, 09:09 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 34
Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by theodds Seems to me that maximizing the likelihood function of this guy is equivalent to minimizing  . The value that accomplishes this is a well known summary statistic, albeit not the sample mean. | Which statistic is that?
Also, if I were to try to estimate theta through method of moments...how would I do it? | 
November 23rd, 2009, 09:22 AM
|  | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,962
Country: Thanks: 127
Thanked 814 Times in 731 Posts
| | the median | | The following users thank matheagle for this useful post: | |  | 
November 23rd, 2009, 10:26 AM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 18
Country: Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | ^ what he said. | 
November 23rd, 2009, 10:33 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 34
Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
| | What about using method of moments? | 
November 23rd, 2009, 12:57 PM
|  | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,962
Country: Thanks: 127
Thanked 814 Times in 731 Posts
| |
and set that equal to the sample mean.
I rushed but I got theta as I expected
Let  in the first integral and
in the second | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:18 AM. | | |