| 
December 1st, 2008, 06:43 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 53
Country: Thanks: 20
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Marginal Density (Please Help) Find the marginal density of X given that (fx|y=y(x)) = e^(-y)*y^x/x!
(i.e., that the conditional density of X, given that Y=y is Poisson(y))
and that fy(y) = lamda^a / gamma(a) * y^(a-1)*e^(-lamda*y) where a(alpha) is a positive integer (i.e., the random variable Y has gamma(a,lamda) density). Hint: fx(x) is a well-known density.
???? ㅡㅡ;; | 
December 2nd, 2008, 04:15 AM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,229
Country: Thanks: 2,574
Thanked 4,756 Times in 4,189 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ninano1205 Find the marginal density of X given that (fx|y=y(x)) = e^(-y)*y^x/x!
(i.e., that the conditional density of X, given that Y=y is Poisson(y))
and that fy(y) = lamda^a / gamma(a) * y^(a-1)*e^(-lamda*y) where a(alpha) is a positive integer (i.e., the random variable Y has gamma(a,lamda) density). Hint: fx(x) is a well-known density.
???? ㅡㅡ;; | The starting point would be
where f(x, y) is the joint pdf of X and Y.
Now substitute the given distributions for  and  .
Now integrate f(x, y) with respect to y to get  .
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| | The following users thank mr fantastic for this useful post: | |  | 
December 3rd, 2008, 01:35 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5
Country: Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| | But the real problem is the integration.
I cannot proceed from the ingral of f(x,y) with repect to y.
Anythought? | | The following users thank dingdong for this useful post: | |  | 
December 4th, 2008, 04:16 AM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,229
Country: Thanks: 2,574
Thanked 4,756 Times in 4,189 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by dingdong But the real problem is the integration.
I cannot proceed from the ingral of f(x,y) with repect to y.
Anythought? | After substituting the various pdf's and simplifying, you have to deal with the following integral:  .
I suggest making the substitution  to get the integral representation of the gamma function.
Note:  .
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:44 PM. | | |
 | |  |