| 
June 29th, 2009, 09:10 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | distribution probability Hello everyone!
I would like to know how to do this question.
Let X have the distribution N(80,225). Find
a. 
b. P(X<50)
c. P(X>95)
d. P(|X-80|>18)
Thanks | 
June 29th, 2009, 09:31 PM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,226
Country: Thanks: 2,574
Thanked 4,756 Times in 4,189 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by WillB Hello everyone!
I would like to know how to do this question.
Let X have the distribution N(80,225). Find
a. 
b. P(X<50)
c. P(X>95)
d. P(|X-80|>18)
Thanks | Are you using tables?
Your textbook or class notes should have salient examples to follow. You will need to be much more specific in stating what you can and can't do.
Note:
If using tables, you first need to convert X-values to Z-values.
a. = Pr(X < 85) - Pr(X < 75) = ....
b.  .
c. = 1 - Pr(X < 95) = ....
d. = Pr(X > 98) + Pr(X < 62) = 2 Pr(X > 98) (since 80 is the mean) = 2 (1 - Pr(X < 98)) = ....
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| | The following users thank mr fantastic for this useful post: | |  | 
June 30th, 2009, 02:38 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | I'm sorry. I am using tables to find the values. This is my first post and I am not really sure how this works. I will show you what I did so far. a. b. P(X<50)  (I'm not sure which table to use for >)
1-0.9772=0.0228 c. P(X>95) d. P(|X-80|>18)
I'm not exactly sure how you did it, but going from your work:
2(1-P(X<98)
2(1-0.8849)=0.2302
Last edited by WillB; June 30th, 2009 at 03:19 PM.
Reason: im confusing the 2 charts
| 
June 30th, 2009, 04:17 PM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,226
Country: Thanks: 2,574
Thanked 4,756 Times in 4,189 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by WillB | ..
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| | The following users thank mr fantastic for this useful post: | |  | 
June 30th, 2009, 04:57 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | You have been a great help! The tables in the book only show two decimal points, so for part a I used 0.33 as my value. I could calculate it using the formula, but what does the 'w' mean?
I don't know how I messed up c (answer should be 0.1587) and YES, now I understand where you got d. | 
June 30th, 2009, 05:07 PM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,226
Country: Thanks: 2,574
Thanked 4,756 Times in 4,189 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by WillB You have been a great help! The tables in the book only show two decimal points, so for part a I used 0.33 as my value. I could calculate it using the formula, but what does the 'w' mean?
[snip] | What w? In your tables? I'm afraid I don't know without seeing the context.
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
June 30th, 2009, 05:23 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Yes, they give this equation at the top of the normal distibution table  I see that  , so w should be the same thing. | 
June 30th, 2009, 05:36 PM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,226
Country: Thanks: 2,574
Thanked 4,756 Times in 4,189 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by WillB Yes, they give this equation at the top of the normal distibution table  I see that  , so w should be the same thing. | This intergral is the cdf of the normal distribution. w is a dummy variable of integration. The integral can't be done exactly (unless z = 0 or +oo), it has to be done numerically using technology (in which case you may as well just use the technology to directly get the probability in the first place).
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
July 1st, 2009, 01:44 AM
|  | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,367
Country: Thanks: 99
Thanked 560 Times in 503 Posts
| | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:00 PM. | | |