Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > University Math Help > Advanced Probability and Statistics
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 1st, 2009, 08:36 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 97
Country:
Thanks: 23
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
acc100jt is on a distinguished road
Default Collecting coupons

Suppose that there are N distinct tyoes of coupons and each time one obtains a coupon it is, independent of prior selections, equally likely to be any one of the N types. One random variable of interest is T, the number of coupons that needs to be collected until one obtains a complete set of at least one of each type. Rather than derive P\{T=n\} directly, let us start by considering the probability that T is greater than n. To do so, fix n and define the events A_{1}, A_{2}, ..., A_{N} as follows: A_{j} is the event that no type j coupon is contained among the first n, j=1, ..., N.
Hence, P\{T>n\}=P\left(\bigcup^{N}_{j=1}A_{j}\right)

I coulnd't understand the last equality, and why can't we derive P\{T=n\} directly?

Appreciate those who help!!
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old July 3rd, 2009, 06:50 AM
Super Member

 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lyon, France
Posts: 735
Country:
Thanks: 44
Thanked 469 Times in 390 Posts
Laurent is a name known to allLaurent is a name known to allLaurent is a name known to allLaurent is a name known to allLaurent is a name known to allLaurent is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by acc100jt View Post
Suppose that there are N distinct tyoes of coupons and each time one obtains a coupon it is, independent of prior selections, equally likely to be any one of the N types. One random variable of interest is T, the number of coupons that needs to be collected until one obtains a complete set of at least one of each type. Rather than derive P\{T=n\} directly, let us start by considering the probability that T is greater than n. To do so, fix n and define the events A_{1}, A_{2}, ..., A_{N} as follows: A_{j} is the event that no type j coupon is contained among the first n, j=1, ..., N.
Hence, P\{T>n\}=P\left(\bigcup^{N}_{j=1}A_{j}\right)

I coulnd't understand the last equality, and why can't we derive P\{T=n\} directly?

Appreciate those who help!!
The equality is just a translation from words to maths of a simple statement, namely "The event \{T>n\} means that among the first n coupons there is a missing type j\in\{1,\ldots,N\} of coupons". This should be clear (otherwise, give it a second thought ; remember T is the first time we have all types of coupons).
Then \bigcup_{j=1}^N A_j is the event "There exists j\in\{1,\ldots,N\} such that A_j happens", and here we are since A_j is defined as: "the type j is missing among the n first coupons".

About P(T=n), if you can derive it directly, that's just fine! It is probably easier however (here and in a large variety of situations) to find P(T>n) and then deduce the first one by P(T=n)=P(T>n-1)-P(T>n).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.