Quote:
Originally Posted by roninpro Hello. I am having some difficulty proving the following:
If  converges and  is monotonic and bounded, then  converges.
I tried using the Cauchy Criterion and partial summation to handle this, but I haven't had any luck. Your insight would be appreciated. |
It's a result of Dirichlet's test: if

is a bounded series (i.e., its partials sums sequence is bounded) and if

is a descending monotone sequence that converges to zero, then

converges:
Since

is monotone and bounded it converges to a finite limit, say L. Assume it is monotone ascending (if it is descending it is very simmlilar) , so we get
![(L-b_n) \xrightarrow [n\to \infty] {} 0 (L-b_n) \xrightarrow [n\to \infty] {} 0](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/cbf523c47c5285bc42575ec6593e765b-1.gif)
monotonically descending and

is bounded because it is convergent, and thus by Dirichlet's test the series

converges, but then:

is the difference of two convergent series and thus it converges, and

by arithmetic of limts, and we're done.
Tonio