Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > University Math Help > Analysis, Topology and Differential Geometry
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 6th, 2009, 10:59 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 45
Country:
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
problem is on a distinguished road
Default Lebesgue Integral

Suppose f is a non-negative integrable function on X.For each n,define E_n= \{ x \in X : f(x)>n \}.
Show that lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} m(E_n) =0.
(m(A) is the measure of A.)

I was trying to prove that since f is integrable,then f < \infty   a.e..Since E_n is a decreasing sequence of sets,so lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} m(E_n) = m( \bigcap_{n \in N} E_n)
Since f< \infty   a.e so \bigcap_{n \in N} E_n = \phi

so m( \phi ) = 0 and hence get the result.
but the problem is I have to assume m(E_1) < \infty to claim the result.I was stuck here.
Can anyone help?Or if this is not the correct approach,can anyone show me the right way?
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old November 7th, 2009, 12:49 AM
Moo's Avatar
Moo Moo is offline
A Cute Angle
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: P(I'm here)=1/3, P(I'm there)=t+1/3
Posts: 5,378
Country:
Thanks: 524
Thanked 3,065 Times in 2,536 Posts
Moo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Hello,

What do you think of that ?

I first started by looking at the integral of f over E_n :

\int_{E_n} f ~d\mu=\int_{\mathbb{R}} f \cdot \bold{1}_{\{f>n\}} ~d\mu

But in this case, we have f>n. Otherwise, it's 0.
So \int_{E_n} f~d\mu>\int_{\mathbb{R}} n \cdot \bold{1}_{\{f>n\}} ~ d\mu=n\int_{\mathbb{R}} \bold{1}_{\{f>n\}} ~d\mu=n\mu(E_n)

Now, we know that f is integrable. This means that \int_{\mathbb{R}}f ~d\mu<\infty

And since E_n\subset \mathbb{R}, we have \int_{\mathbb{R}}f ~d\mu\geq \int_{E_n}f ~d\mu


Finally, we get \infty > \int_{\mathbb{R}} f ~d\mu> n\mu(E_n)

Now what happens if n goes to infinity ? Unless \mu(E_n)\to 0, n\mu(E_n) \to \infty...
A simple proof by contradiction can finish it
__________________
Everything is possible. The impossible just takes longer.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

shinhidora production

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

- I hate, I can't stand, I abhor, I dislike, I disdain, I detest, I loathe, I despise and I am repelled by tousled birds of pray.
Reply With Quote
The following users thank Moo for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.