Supremum and LUB are two words for the same thing. LUB and maximum are not the same concept, since a maximum of a set must reside inside the set, whereas the LUB is not required to.
My guess is that what they are looking for is a proof that A is non-empty and bounded above, so that the LUB exists. Probably the main point is showing that it is bounded above.
The following users thank theodds for this useful post:
A is non-empty and bounded above therefore by the completenessaxiom the supremum of A exists. Can you get me started please?
Also is maximum and least upper bound of a set the same thing?
Thanks
As already said, you must first prove A is non-empty and bounded above, which seems to be fairly simple. Now take a look at and prove this number is the LUB:
1) First, prove w is an upper bound;
2) Prove that
Tonio
The following users thank tonio for this useful post:
Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics. Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.