| 
June 4th, 2009, 01:22 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 51
Country: Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Complex Analysis Residue question if f has a zero of order 2 at z0 and A=f''(z0) and B=f'''(z0) and h(z)=1/f(z), how does one find a formula for Res(h;z0) in terms of A and B?
thanks! | 
June 4th, 2009, 05:13 PM
| | Super Member | | Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 601
Country: Thanks: 46
Thanked 262 Times in 227 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by morganfor if f has a zero of order 2 at z0 and A=f''(z0) and B=f'''(z0) and h(z)=1/f(z), how does one find a formula for Res(h;z0) in terms of A and B?
thanks! | Just expand them in terms of Laurent series:
Therefore
Multiply it out, take derivatives, equate coefficients and solve for
I'd recommend you find "Basic Complex Analysis" by Marsden and Hoffman. It's a nice read on basic stuff and it goes over this derivation.
__________________ "I am beset by the ironies in my life"
Last edited by mr fantastic; June 4th, 2009 at 10:26 PM.
Reason: Fixed a couple of subscripts
| 
June 4th, 2009, 05:21 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 429
Country: Thanks: 39
Thanked 169 Times in 159 Posts
| | You could try the following:
then using the product rule
And then since the forms of both terms are indeterminate, apply L'Hospital's rule. But multiple applications will be required. | 
June 5th, 2009, 11:22 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 51
Country: Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Thank you!
Shawsend, I'm just confused about where the g(z) came from and what it is - do you mean f(z)? | 
June 5th, 2009, 03:26 PM
| | Super Member | | Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 601
Country: Thanks: 46
Thanked 262 Times in 227 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by shawsend Just expand them in terms of Laurent series:
Therefore
Multiply it out, take derivatives, equate coefficients and solve for
I'd recommend you find "Basic Complex Analysis" by Marsden and Hoffman. It's a nice read on basic stuff and it goes over this derivation. | I'm sorry my  conflicts with your  . Mine was just general terms. You have: 
and: 
and therefore ![1=\left[\frac{f''(z_0)}{2}+\frac{f'''(z_0)}{6}(z-z_0)+\cdots\right]\cdot\left[b_2+b_1(z-z_0)+a_1(z-z_0)^2+\cdots\right] 1=\left[\frac{f''(z_0)}{2}+\frac{f'''(z_0)}{6}(z-z_0)+\cdots\right]\cdot\left[b_2+b_1(z-z_0)+a_1(z-z_0)^2+\cdots\right]](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/f4496916c06f1d21ab506117de94b7c6-1.gif)
so that 
Equating coefficients: 
and: 
Solving for
__________________ "I am beset by the ironies in my life" | 
June 5th, 2009, 03:38 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 429
Country: Thanks: 39
Thanked 169 Times in 159 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by shawsend I'm sorry my  conflicts with your  . Mine was just general terms. You have: 
and: 
and therefore ![1=\left[\frac{f''(z_0)}{2}+\frac{f'''(z_0)}{6}(z-z_0)+\cdots\right]\cdot\left[b_2+b_1(z-z_0)+a_1(z-z_0)^2+\cdots\right] 1=\left[\frac{f''(z_0)}{2}+\frac{f'''(z_0)}{6}(z-z_0)+\cdots\right]\cdot\left[b_2+b_1(z-z_0)+a_1(z-z_0)^2+\cdots\right]](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/f4496916c06f1d21ab506117de94b7c6-1.gif)
so that 
Equating coefficients: 
and: 
Solving for  | This might be a stupid question, but how do we know that  ? | 
June 5th, 2009, 04:02 PM
| | Super Member | | Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 601
Country: Thanks: 46
Thanked 262 Times in 227 Posts
| | If  has a zero of order 2 at  , then  can be written as:
but that's the Taylor series which is unique so that:
and so on. That means the first two terms of the Taylor series must be zero or  and  .
__________________ "I am beset by the ironies in my life" | | The following users thank shawsend for this useful post: | |  | 
June 5th, 2009, 07:35 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 429
Country: Thanks: 39
Thanked 169 Times in 159 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by shawsend If  has a zero of order 2 at  , then  can be written as:
but that's the Taylor series which is unique so that:
and so on. That means the first two terms of the Taylor series must be zero or  and  . | But basically what you're using is the fact that if  is a zero of  of order k, then  , right?
I don't why I didn't realize that before. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:05 PM. | | |
 | |  |