Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > University Math Help > Analysis, Topology and Differential Geometry
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 2nd, 2009, 05:42 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3
Country:
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
skeboy is on a distinguished road
Post Complex Power Series Boundary Property

In Shilov's Elementary Real and Complex Analysis, he writes on page 216:

'As we know, a (complex) power series a0 + a1 (z - z0) + a2 (z - z0)^2 + ... with radius of convergence p may or may not converge at points on the boundary of its region of convergence, i.e., at points of the circle |z - z0| = p. However, if the series converges at a boundary point z1, then it converges uniformly on the whole segment going from the center of the circle z0 to the boundary point z1. To see this, we need only consider the case z0 = 0, z1 = t1 > 0 (here z1 = t1 is real, as opposed to the general case where it is complex). Why?"

He then goes on to prove the special case with z0 = 0 and z1 = t1 > 0. Why does having proved this special case imply the general case for any point on the boundary of a region of convergence centered at any complex point? I think it may have something to do with shifting the power series and dividing/multiplying, but I'm not sure quite how to make it work.

Last edited by skeboy; July 2nd, 2009 at 10:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old July 5th, 2009, 05:48 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 84
Country:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 57 Times in 43 Posts
halbard will become famous soon enough
Default

Suppose you have a complex power series \sum_{n=0}^\infty b_n(z-z_0)^n with radius of convergence R>0 which converges at some point z_1 on the boundary of the disk D=D(z_0,R). By shifting and rotating the axes, you obtain another power series \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nz^n with radius of convergence R which converges at the point z=R. (If z_1=z_0+R\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta} then a_n=b_n\mathrm e^{\mathrm in\theta}.)

Now you need Abel's test: Let f_n be a sequence of complex functions on a set A and let g_n be a decreasing sequence of non-negative functions on A. If the series \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_n converges uniformly on A and if there is a constant M such that |g_n(x)|\leq M for every x\in A and for all non-negative integers n, then \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_ng_n converges uniformly on A.

In this case, let A=[0,R], and for x\in A let f_n(x)=a_nR^n and g_n(x)=(x/R)^n.

By hypothesis, the series \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nR^n is convergent, so \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_n(x) converges uniformly on A. Also |g_n(x)|\leq 1 for all n and for all x\in A.

By Abel's test, the series \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_n(x)g_n(x)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nR^n(x/R)^n=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nx^n converges uniformly on [0,R].

Thus the original series is uniformly convergent on the radius of D from z_0 to z_1.

Will this do?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.