| 
January 3rd, 2009, 09:22 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 17
Country: Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
| | Statistics, averages and deviations. A population consists of the five numbers 2,3,6,8 and 11. Consider all possible samples of 2 that can be drawn with replacement from this population (i.e. as soon as soon as number has been drawn and its value noted it is replaced and can be drawn again). Find
i) The mean of the population.
ii) The standard deviation of the population.
iii) The mean of the sampling distibution of means.
iv) The standard deviation of the sampling distribution of means.
---------------------------------------
For i) I calculated the mean to be 6.0 however I found the standard deviation for part ii) to be 3.67 to which I am unsure of its reliability.
Can anyone please help with these please, I am keen to learn the method to solving these.
Regards | 
January 4th, 2009, 12:27 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 462
Country: Thanks: 107
Thanked 157 Times in 147 Posts
| | | | The following users thank Aryth for this useful post: | |  | 
January 4th, 2009, 01:24 AM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,239
Country: Thanks: 2,575
Thanked 4,762 Times in 4,194 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by RossBrons A population consists of the five numbers 2,3,6,8 and 11. Consider all possible samples of 2 that can be drawn with replacement from this population (i.e. as soon as soon as number has been drawn and its value noted it is replaced and can be drawn again). Find
i) The mean of the population.
ii) The standard deviation of the population.
iii) The mean of the sampling distibution of means.
iv) The standard deviation of the sampling distribution of means.
---------------------------------------
For i) I calculated the mean to be 6.0 however I found the standard deviation for part ii) to be 3.67 to which I am unsure of its reliability.
Can anyone please help with these please, I am keen to learn the method to solving these.
Regards | For (iii) and (iv) read this: Sampling distribution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
January 4th, 2009, 10:06 AM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 17
Country: Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
| | Thanks, for the input Aryth, that was very helpful.
Is the standard deviation not...
And is the standard deviation of 
Thereby meaning the standard deviation is not 3.29 but 1.47?
I'm lost, can you please untangle this mess?
Thanks
Mr Fantastic, I can't understand how to apply the math on that wiki article. Kind Regards,
Ross
Last edited by RossBrons; January 4th, 2009 at 10:51 AM.
| 
January 4th, 2009, 12:23 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7
Country: Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | the second one in an unbiased estimatior ? | 
January 4th, 2009, 12:41 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 462
Country: Thanks: 107
Thanked 157 Times in 147 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by RossBrons Thanks, for the input Aryth, that was very helpful.
Is the standard deviation not...
And is the standard deviation of 
Thereby meaning the standard deviation is not 3.29 but 1.47?
I'm lost, can you please untangle this mess?
Thanks
Mr Fantastic, I can't understand how to apply the math on that wiki article. Kind Regards,
Ross | Both can be used, but the one I provided has a smaller error in estimation, but using the N-1 formula, the standard deviation is the 3.67 that you had initially, and not 1.47.
Your sampling distribution formula is the correct one. | 
January 4th, 2009, 12:44 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 17
Country: Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Aryth Both can be used, but the one I provided has a smaller error in estimation, but using the N-1 formula, the standard deviation is the 3.67 that you had initially, and not 1.47.
Your sampling distribution formula is the correct one. | Yeah, thanks for that. Greatly appreciated.
Has anyone got any ideas on how to tackle part iii and iv?
Cheers,
Ross | 
January 4th, 2009, 02:46 PM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,239
Country: Thanks: 2,575
Thanked 4,762 Times in 4,194 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by RossBrons Thanks, for the input Aryth, that was very helpful.
Is the standard deviation not...
[snip] | This is an unbiased estimator and is used to estimate the sd of a population from a sample taken from the population. You have only a sample (no mention of where it's come from) and you want the sd of only the sample. So the original formula you were given is the one to use.
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by mr fantastic; January 4th, 2009 at 03:02 PM.
| 
January 4th, 2009, 03:00 PM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,239
Country: Thanks: 2,575
Thanked 4,762 Times in 4,194 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by RossBrons And is the standard deviation of Mr F says: Yes.
Mr Fantastic, I can't understand how to apply the math on that wiki article. Kind Regards,
Ross |  .  .
Substitute  and  and  .
It's that simple.
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:29 PM. | | |