Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > Pre-University Math Help > Basic Statistics and Probability
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 3rd, 2009, 09:22 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 17
Country:
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
RossBrons is on a distinguished road
Default Statistics, averages and deviations.

A population consists of the five numbers 2,3,6,8 and 11. Consider all possible samples of 2 that can be drawn with replacement from this population (i.e. as soon as soon as number has been drawn and its value noted it is replaced and can be drawn again). Find

i) The mean of the population.

ii) The standard deviation of the population.

iii) The mean of the sampling distibution of means.

iv) The standard deviation of the sampling distribution of means.

---------------------------------------

For i) I calculated the mean to be 6.0 however I found the standard deviation for part ii) to be 3.67 to which I am unsure of its reliability.


Can anyone please help with these please, I am keen to learn the method to solving these.

Regards
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old January 4th, 2009, 12:27 AM
Aryth's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 462
Country:
Thanks: 107
Thanked 157 Times in 147 Posts
Aryth has a spectacular aura aboutAryth has a spectacular aura about
Default

You have found the mean to be:

\bar{x} = 6.0

So, the standard deviation is:

\sigma = \sqrt{\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N (x_i - \bar{x})^2}

Where N is the number of elements in the population, x_i is the i-th element in the set, and \bar{x} is the mean.

\sigma = \sqrt{\frac{1}{5} \sum_{i = 1}^5 (x_i - 6.0)^2}

\sigma = \sqrt{\frac{1}{5}\left[ (2 - 6)^2 + (3 - 6)^2 + (6 - 6)^2 + (8 - 6)^2 + (11 - 6)^2 \right] }

\sigma = \sqrt{\frac{1}{5}\left[(-4)^2 + (-3)^2 + (0)^2 + (2)^2 + (5)^2 \right]}

\sigma = \sqrt{\frac{1}{5} (16 + 9 + 0 + 4 + 25)}

\sigma = \sqrt{\frac{1}{5} (54)}

\sigma = \sqrt{10.8}

\sigma = 3.29

And there you go.
Reply With Quote
The following users thank Aryth for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
  #3  
Old January 4th, 2009, 01:24 AM
mr fantastic's Avatar
Flow Master

 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,239
Country:
Thanks: 2,575
Thanked 4,762 Times in 4,194 Posts
mr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RossBrons View Post
A population consists of the five numbers 2,3,6,8 and 11. Consider all possible samples of 2 that can be drawn with replacement from this population (i.e. as soon as soon as number has been drawn and its value noted it is replaced and can be drawn again). Find

i) The mean of the population.

ii) The standard deviation of the population.

iii) The mean of the sampling distibution of means.

iv) The standard deviation of the sampling distribution of means.

---------------------------------------

For i) I calculated the mean to be 6.0 however I found the standard deviation for part ii) to be 3.67 to which I am unsure of its reliability.


Can anyone please help with these please, I am keen to learn the method to solving these.

Regards
For (iii) and (iv) read this: Sampling distribution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious.

The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti)

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old January 4th, 2009, 10:06 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 17
Country:
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
RossBrons is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks, for the input Aryth, that was very helpful.

Is the standard deviation not...

\sigma = \sqrt{\frac{1}{N-1}\sum_{i=1}^N (x_i - \bar{x})^2}

And is the standard deviation of \bar{X} = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}
Thereby meaning the standard deviation is not 3.29 but 1.47?
I'm lost, can you please untangle this mess?

Thanks

Mr Fantastic, I can't understand how to apply the math on that wiki article. Kind Regards,
Ross

Last edited by RossBrons; January 4th, 2009 at 10:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 4th, 2009, 12:23 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7
Country:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
vg284 is on a distinguished road
Default

the second one in an unbiased estimatior ?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 4th, 2009, 12:41 PM
Aryth's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 462
Country:
Thanks: 107
Thanked 157 Times in 147 Posts
Aryth has a spectacular aura aboutAryth has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RossBrons View Post
Thanks, for the input Aryth, that was very helpful.

Is the standard deviation not...

\sigma = \sqrt{\frac{1}{N-1}\sum_{i=1}^N (x_i - \bar{x})^2}

And is the standard deviation of \bar{X} = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}
Thereby meaning the standard deviation is not 3.29 but 1.47?
I'm lost, can you please untangle this mess?

Thanks

Mr Fantastic, I can't understand how to apply the math on that wiki article. Kind Regards,
Ross
Both can be used, but the one I provided has a smaller error in estimation, but using the N-1 formula, the standard deviation is the 3.67 that you had initially, and not 1.47.

Your sampling distribution formula is the correct one.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old January 4th, 2009, 12:44 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 17
Country:
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
RossBrons is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aryth View Post
Both can be used, but the one I provided has a smaller error in estimation, but using the N-1 formula, the standard deviation is the 3.67 that you had initially, and not 1.47.

Your sampling distribution formula is the correct one.
Yeah, thanks for that. Greatly appreciated.

Has anyone got any ideas on how to tackle part iii and iv?

Cheers,
Ross
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old January 4th, 2009, 02:46 PM
mr fantastic's Avatar
Flow Master

 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,239
Country:
Thanks: 2,575
Thanked 4,762 Times in 4,194 Posts
mr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RossBrons View Post
Thanks, for the input Aryth, that was very helpful.

Is the standard deviation not...

\sigma = \sqrt{\frac{1}{N-1}\sum_{i=1}^N (x_i - \bar{x})^2}

[snip]
This is an unbiased estimator and is used to estimate the sd of a population from a sample taken from the population. You have only a sample (no mention of where it's come from) and you want the sd of only the sample. So the original formula you were given is the one to use.
__________________
There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious.

The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti)

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by mr fantastic; January 4th, 2009 at 03:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old January 4th, 2009, 03:00 PM
mr fantastic's Avatar
Flow Master

 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,239
Country:
Thanks: 2,575
Thanked 4,762 Times in 4,194 Posts
mr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RossBrons View Post
And is the standard deviation of \bar{X} = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}} Mr F says: Yes.

Mr Fantastic, I can't understand how to apply the math on that wiki article. Kind Regards,
Ross
\mu_{\overline{X}} = \mu.

\sigma_{\overline{X}} = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}.

Substitute \mu = 6.0 and \sigma = 3.29 and n = 2.

It's that simple.
__________________
There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious.

The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti)

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.