| 
November 2nd, 2009, 06:56 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 31
Country: Thanks: 23
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| | L'Hospital's Rule Find the limit of x(tan(8/x)) as it approaches infinity.
If I plug in infinity, I get (infinity * 0) so the problem is an indeterminate form.
So I find the limit of tan(8/x) / (1/x). This is (0 * 0) so I can use l'Hospital's rule:
sec^2(8/x)(-8x^-2) / 1
That still is (0 * 0), so I can use l'Hospital's again. I get:
(16x^-3) (2sec(8/x)(-8x^-2)
At this time I realize that this doesn't look like it's helping me, so I probably did something wrong. Can someone look over my work, tell me if I'm on the right track, and if not, tell me what I did wrong? Thanks. | 
November 2nd, 2009, 09:18 PM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,243
Country: Thanks: 2,576
Thanked 4,763 Times in 4,195 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Maziana Find the limit of x(tan(8/x)) as it approaches infinity.
If I plug in infinity, I get (infinity * 0) so the problem is an indeterminate form.
So I find the limit of tan(8/x) / (1/x). This is (0 * 0) so I can use l'Hospital's rule:
sec^2(8/x)(-8x^-2) / 1
That still is (0 * 0), so I can use l'Hospital's again. I get:
(16x^-3) (2sec(8/x)(-8x^-2)
At this time I realize that this doesn't look like it's helping me, so I probably did something wrong. Can someone look over my work, tell me if I'm on the right track, and if not, tell me what I did wrong? Thanks. | Your derivative of  is wrong. You need to use the chain rule.
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| | The following users thank mr fantastic for this useful post: | |  | 
November 2nd, 2009, 09:20 PM
| | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,525
Country: Thanks: 48
Thanked 603 Times in 565 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by mr fantastic Your derivative of  is wrong. You need to use the chain rule. | Actually the derivative of  , which is ![\sec^2{\left(\frac{8}{x}\right)}[-8x^{-2}] \sec^2{\left(\frac{8}{x}\right)}[-8x^{-2}]](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/c5e2948eb03db1858b7d02192d653cf8-1.gif) is correct.
It is the derivative of  in the denominator that is incorrect.
__________________ Two things are infinite - The Universe and Human Stupidity. Though I'm not too sure about the universe... | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Prove It For This Useful Post: | |  | 
November 3rd, 2009, 10:42 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 31
Country: Thanks: 23
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| | That's right; thanks. 1/x should go to -1/x^2. So it should be:
sec^2(8/x)(-8x^-2) / -1/x^2
That's still (0 * 0), so I can use l'Hospital's again. But I still don't see how that helps; it just makes the problem even more complicated. | 
November 3rd, 2009, 11:43 AM
| | Member | | Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 110
Country: Thanks: 18
Thanked 26 Times in 26 Posts
| | Try setting  now when  ,
Then you can calculate the limit:  . | | The following users thank hjortur for this useful post: | |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:27 AM. | | |
 | |  |