Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > University Math Help > Calculus
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 3rd, 2009, 06:33 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 34
Country:
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Skerven is on a distinguished road
Default If a (x_n) --> M, then (y_m=(x_1+...+x_m)/m) --> M

(x_{n}) and y_{m} = \frac{x_{1}+...+x_{m}}{m}

I need to show that \lim_{n\to\infty}(x_{n}) = M \rightarrow \lim_{m\to\infty}(y_{m}) = M.

I started by writing out the definition of convergence for (x_{n})
\forall \epsilon > 0, \exists k(\epsilon) : \forall n > k(\epsilon), |x_{n} - M| < \epsilon

Then I discovered that
x_{n} = y_{n} + (n - 1) * (y_{n+1} - y_{n})
But I don't know how to show the convergence of (y_{n})
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old November 3rd, 2009, 09:01 AM
MHF Contributor

 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,718
Thanks: 69
Thanked 2,486 Times in 2,280 Posts
Plato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skerven View Post
(x_{n}) and y_{m} = \frac{x_{1}+...+x_{m}}{m}
Show that \lim_{n\to\infty}(x_{n}) = M \rightarrow \lim_{m\to\infty}(y_{m}) = M.
I find it easier to do this by using two cases.
Case I. Suppose that M=0. Then use the notation S_N  = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^N {x_k }.
If \varepsilon  > 0 find a K such n\ge K implies that \frac{{\left| {S_K } \right|}}{n} < \frac{\varepsilon }{2}\;\& \,\left| {x_n } \right| < \frac{\varepsilon }{2}.
Then \left| {y_n } \right| = \left| {\frac{{S_n }}
{n}} \right| = \left| {\frac{{S_n  - S_K  + S_K }}
{n}} \right| \leqslant \frac{1}
{n}\sum\limits_{k = K + 1}^n {\left| {x_k } \right|}  + \frac{{\left| {S_K } \right|}}
{n} < \frac{1}
{n}\left( {n - K + 1} \right)\frac{\varepsilon }
{2} + \frac{\varepsilon }
{2}.

Case II. M\ne 0 In that case let z_n=x_n-M and apply case I.
Reply With Quote
The following users thank Plato for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
  #3  
Old November 3rd, 2009, 10:21 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 34
Country:
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Skerven is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Plato View Post
If \varepsilon  > 0 find a K such n\ge K implies that \frac{{\left| {S_K } \right|}}{n} < \frac{\varepsilon }{2}
How do you know that you can find such a K? It seems like you are assuming what you are trying to prove.

Edit: Ok, so you are choosing a K that satisfies the second inequality, justified by assumption.

Then you are increasing K until you find a range of n that satisfied the first inequality. Got it.

Last edited by Skerven; November 3rd, 2009 at 10:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.