| 
October 21st, 2007, 12:09 AM
| | Member | | Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 75
Country: Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| | The linear approximation of a function Find the linear approximation of the function f (x, y, z) = root(x^2 + y^2 + z^2) at (3, 2, 6) and use it to approximate the number
root((3.02)^2 + (1.97)^2 + (5.99)^2)
Thanks. | 
October 21st, 2007, 12:18 AM
|  | vs Jhevon | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: New York, USA
Posts: 11,104
Country: Thanks: 2,610
Thanked 4,271 Times in 3,970 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Undefdisfigure Find the linear approximation of the function f (x, y, z) = root(x^2 + y^2 + z^2) at (3, 2, 6) and use it to approximate the number
root((3.02)^2 + (1.97)^2 + (5.99)^2)
Thanks. | use the formula,
for  close to
here, use  and
note,  are the derivative with respect to x,y,and z respectively, evaluated at
can you take it from here? | | The following users thank Jhevon for this useful post: | |  | 
October 21st, 2007, 07:28 AM
|  | Generous Contributor | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 7,618
Country: Thanks: 643
Thanked 2,312 Times in 2,098 Posts
| | For the record the multidimensional Taylor series around the point  is 
where the expression employs multi-index notation. (I don't know the formula for the error term, sorry! But you can probably generalize it from the 1D Taylor series.)
-Dan
__________________ Got a Physics question? Come on over to To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert | 
October 21st, 2007, 01:03 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 75
Country: Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| | No, I got up to what you wrote in reply to my thread. That part I understand. I ran into problems when I was taking the partial derivative and was hoping you could show me how to take the partial derivatives. Thanks for your reply though and I'm hoping you can go a couple of steps further.
By the way the book gives the answer 3/7x + 2/7y + 6/7z. It appears the point (3, 2, 6) is used in the answer but I don't know how they got it. | 
October 21st, 2007, 01:26 PM
|  | vs Jhevon | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: New York, USA
Posts: 11,104
Country: Thanks: 2,610
Thanked 4,271 Times in 3,970 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by topsquark For the record the multidimensional Taylor series around the point  is 
where the expression employs multi-index notation. (I don't know the formula for the error term, sorry! But you can probably generalize it from the 1D Taylor series.)
-Dan | hehe, we did that in my class the other day. I don't remember the formula for the error term, and i can't bother reaching for my text right now. maybe i'll update this post later... or TPH may tell you, he remembers all this stuff off the top of his head after reading it once. Heck, he could probably tell you on what specific homework problems he used it in (the section in the text, the problem number, maybe the page number, and the exact question), again, of course, off the top of his head. Quote:
Originally Posted by Undefdisfigure No, I got up to what you wrote in reply to my thread. That part I understand. I ran into problems when I was taking the partial derivative and was hoping you could show me how to take the partial derivatives. Thanks for your reply though and I'm hoping you can go a couple of steps further.
By the way the book gives the answer 3/7x + 2/7y + 6/7z. It appears the point (3, 2, 6) is used in the answer but I don't know how they got it. |
i will find  , the partial derivative with respect to  . we treat  and  as constants, and employ the Chain rue:
this problem is "symmetric" in all variables, so for the other partial derivatives, just replace the x in the numerator with the variable you are differentiating with respect to. and continue | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:18 PM. | | |