| 
November 1st, 2007, 10:04 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Country: Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Derivatives and the Cauchy-Riemann equations I need to decide whether the following statement is true or not:
let f be a complex function, f(z)=f(x+iy)=u(x,y)+iv(x,y).if u and v satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations in a neighborhood of z_0 then f is differentiable at z_0. | 
November 1st, 2007, 10:10 PM
|  | Global Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country: Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,751 Times in 3,070 Posts
| | False.
This is Mine 75   th Post!!! | 
November 1st, 2007, 10:17 PM
|  | vs Jhevon | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: New York, USA
Posts: 11,044
Country: Thanks: 2,607
Thanked 4,261 Times in 3,960 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Liav Teichner I need to decide whether the following statement is true or not:
let f be a complex function, f(z)=f(x+iy)=u(x,y)+iv(x,y).if u and v satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations in a neighborhood of z_0 then f is differentiable at z_0. | no. consider  , where  ,  and consider the derivative at z_0 = 0
i got this example from a text book.
can you come up with a nicer example, TPH? | 
November 1st, 2007, 10:25 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Country: Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | I don't think the example is correct: "if u and v satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations in a neighborhood of z_0" - It means there's an open circle (disk) around z0 where the Cauchy-Rieamann equations are satisfied. In your example there is no such circle (neighborhood). Every circle around (0,0) in your example contain positive real numbers where it is easy to show the Cauchy-Riemann equations aren't satisfied. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:16 PM. | | |
 | |  |