| 
December 6th, 2007, 08:02 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 38
Country: Thanks: 98
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Integrals Evaluate | 
December 6th, 2007, 08:45 PM
|  | Global Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country: Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,751 Times in 3,070 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by liyi Evaluate  | 
Thus, 
Let  , | | The following users thank ThePerfectHacker for this useful post: | |  | 
December 6th, 2007, 08:53 PM
|  | Global Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country: Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,751 Times in 3,070 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by liyi Evaluate | Solution 2. In my other post I used that fact that  (it was proven on this forum before).
Here is a method just using the fact that  .
Note that,  | | The following users thank ThePerfectHacker for this useful post: | |  | 
December 7th, 2007, 07:04 AM
|  | Math Engineering Student | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Santiago
Posts: 3,029
Country: Thanks: 82
Thanked 1,350 Times in 1,077 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by liyi Evaluate  | Here's another proof.
We'll use the following fact  (Proven here.)
Now
The integral becomes to
For the inner integral, substitute
Finally
--
A related problem.
--
As for  can be found here. | | The following users thank Krizalid for this useful post: | |  | 
December 7th, 2007, 07:29 AM
|  | Math Engineering Student | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Santiago
Posts: 3,029
Country: Thanks: 82
Thanked 1,350 Times in 1,077 Posts
| | Nice problem Quote:
Originally Posted by liyi | Define
Substitute  so
And finally | | The following users thank Krizalid for this useful post: | |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29 PM. | | |
 | |  |