1)It could be undefined because is not in the domain of f(x)?
2)the answer is and my prof made a mistake(seems unlikely since he's been doing this for 20 years)?
3)my friend says its ?
Can anyone confirm which is correct with justification?
The function does not exist at that point, so neither does its derivative.
Hello, I did this and used Maple to confirm. Finding the derivative of this double ln first:
ln(ln(x)) = 1/ln(x) * 1/x
now you sub in (1/e)
1/ln(1/e) = 1/ln(e^-1) noting that.. ln (e^x) = x
so = 1/ln(e^-1) = 1/-1 * 1/(1/e)
so multiply the reciprical since your dividing by a fraction and your final answer is -e!
Im pretty sure im right, and im matching the answer of your 20 years experience prof :P
Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics. Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.