| 
May 11th, 2008, 06:09 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 95
Country: Thanks: 22
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
| | Two Integrals Not interested in the solutions, but more of how do you know what u should be and such. Trying to grasp how I should look at a problem and piece together what I should do with it.
First integral is (x-1)/(x+1) dx
And second one is xe^(-x^2) dx
Appreciate the help! | 
May 11th, 2008, 06:20 PM
|  | Eater of Worlds | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Chaneysville, PA
Posts: 2,883
Country: Thanks: 121
Thanked 1,105 Times in 993 Posts
| | For the first one, divide first:
Now, it's easy enough to integrate without subbing. | 
May 11th, 2008, 06:23 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 95
Country: Thanks: 22
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
| | How did you know to divide there? Just by practice? Other problems similar to those I've seen them split up and then several u's are used. I'm assuming you did that since the top and bottom powers were equal?? | 
May 11th, 2008, 06:32 PM
|  | Chair of Approximate Accuracy | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Posts: 1,988
Country: Thanks: 275
Thanked 908 Times in 854 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Hibijibi How did you know to divide there? Just by practice? Other problems similar to those I've seen them split up and then several u's are used. I'm assuming you did that since the top and bottom powers were equal?? | As a general rule if the degree of the numerator is greater than or equal to the denominator divide.
I also want to point out this trick (I forget it alot), but when they have the same degree like yours this can be done. | | The following users thank TheEmptySet for this useful post: | |  | 
May 11th, 2008, 06:34 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 95
Country: Thanks: 22
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
| | Wow very useful trick! Taking the derivative of 1 - that is much more cleaner and easier. Thanks!!! Now just some advice on the second one. Integrals are my biggest weakness for this test. | 
May 11th, 2008, 06:39 PM
|  | Chair of Approximate Accuracy | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Posts: 1,988
Country: Thanks: 275
Thanked 908 Times in 854 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Hibijibi Wow very useful trick! Taking the derivative of 1 - that is much more cleaner and easier. Thanks!!! Now just some advice on the second one. Integrals are my biggest weakness for this test. | since we know that the integral
What do you think would be a good sub?
Remember if you are not sure what to pick, pick something that when replaced by u will make the integal easier. If it doesn't work try something else. | 
May 11th, 2008, 06:42 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 95
Country: Thanks: 22
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
| | Would making u= -x^2? Actually yes that would work. Because the derivative would be du = -2x dx, and we have an x. And then I counter balance the -2 with a -1/2 on the outside? | 
May 11th, 2008, 06:53 PM
|  | Chair of Approximate Accuracy | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Posts: 1,988
Country: Thanks: 275
Thanked 908 Times in 854 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Hibijibi Would making u= -x^2? Actually yes that would work. Because the derivative would be du = -2x dx, and we have an x. And then I counter balance the -2 with a -1/2 on the outside? | Yes that is correct. | 
May 11th, 2008, 06:54 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 95
Country: Thanks: 22
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
| | Fantastic, thank you! I also have an issue in my other thread your helping me with. You've been extraordinarily helpful to me, thank you sir. | 
May 11th, 2008, 07:49 PM
|  | Super Member | | Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 723
Country: Thanks: 250
Thanked 241 Times in 195 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Hibijibi And second one is xe^(-x^2) dx | Practice just looking at these ones and being able to tell the answer. First thing you should see is that x is the correct power of a derivative of x^2. And second you should see that e^(whatever) will differentiate to e^(whatever) so
e^(-x^2) differentiates to e^(-x^2) and then we apply the chain rule and get -2xe^(-x^2)
And when you can see this easily, all you need to do is realize that if you multiply this by -1/2 then you will have your integral.
ie: (-1/2) *(-2xe^(-x^2)) = xe^(-x^2)
and since -1/2 is a constant, it will carry all the way through from a f(x) to f'(x)
so we simply change e^(-x^2) into (-1/2)e^(-x^2)
and now when you differentiate it, you will get the formula you are trying to integrate.
meaning
integrate both sides to get:
Here are some more, try doing them without substitution (look at it to find the answer):
1.
2. hint for #2:  3.
4. hint for #4: this hint is a little abstract, if you can't figure out how to apply the thought to the problem, try integrating with substitution and then differentiate your answer to see the process it went through to get to the final solution. 5.
__________________ two can keep a secret if one of them is dead | 
May 11th, 2008, 07:51 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 95
Country: Thanks: 22
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
| | Wow great practice problems. Just what I need! I'll work on those and post back with what I got. Thank you! | 
May 11th, 2008, 08:19 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 95
Country: Thanks: 22
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by angel.white Practice just looking at these ones and being able to tell the answer. First thing you should see is that x is the correct power of a derivative of x^2. And second you should see that e^(whatever) will differentiate to e^(whatever) so
e^(-x^2) differentiates to e^(-x^2) and then we apply the chain rule and get -2xe^(-x^2)
And when you can see this easily, all you need to do is realize that if you multiply this by -1/2 then you will have your integral.
ie: (-1/2) *(-2xe^(-x^2)) = xe^(-x^2)
and since -1/2 is a constant, it will carry all the way through from a f(x) to f'(x)
so we simply change e^(-x^2) into (-1/2)e^(-x^2)
and now when you differentiate it, you will get the formula you are trying to integrate.
meaning
integrate both sides to get:
Here are some more, try doing them without substitution (look at it to find the answer):
1.
2.  hint for #2:  3.
4.  hint for #4: this hint is a little abstract, if you can't figure out how to apply the thought to the problem, try integrating with substitution and then differentiate your answer to see the process it went through to get to the final solution. 5.  | You're telling me you can solve all of those with out any u substitution? Mind giving me a bit more to work off of? I'm very weak in the integral area. :x | 
May 11th, 2008, 08:24 PM
|  | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,664
Country: Thanks: 430
Thanked 1,058 Times in 959 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Hibijibi You're telling me you can solve all of those with out any u substitution? Mind giving me a bit more to work off of? I'm very weak in the integral area. :x | Ok...I will do one and if you want any more in particular done just say so
all of this is u-sub but you do it in your head...if you notice that this is
Thats how all of these are done....you could have done it u-sub
Let
This gives us
back subbing we get | 
May 11th, 2008, 08:39 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 95
Country: Thanks: 22
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
| | Ahh, I understand. Could you expound on 1 and 3 please? | 
May 11th, 2008, 08:45 PM
|  | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,664
Country: Thanks: 430
Thanked 1,058 Times in 959 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Hibijibi Ahh, I understand. Could you expound on 1 and 3 please? | Since
We see that
and for 3
since
We see that | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:05 PM. | | |