| 
November 27th, 2008, 09:06 AM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 89
Country: Thanks: 43
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | How do I write arccos 4 as a + ib (complex number)? This a question from complex number chapter of fp3
Find the following in the form a+ib, a,b member of real number set:
(a) arccos 4 (b) arcsin 2 (c) arcsin i
I tried to these sums by: x=arccos4, so cosx=4, so e^(ix)-e^-(ix)=8
The answers: (a) My answer:+/- i arcosh 4
Book's answer: 2m*pi +/- i arcosh 4
(b) My answer: +/- arcosh 2(i am not sure how i get that)
Book's answer: (4m+1)*pi/2 +/- i arcosh 2
(c) My answer: i ln ((-2+/- sqrt 5)/2))
Book's answer: n*pi + i arsinh [(-1)^n]
So I gathered that I am missing something major here. Please anyone tell me the correct method to do these sums, thus enabling me to try it out myself. Just tell me the method, please  This is my first sums of this kind:woo:
P.s. i=imaginary. | 
November 27th, 2008, 10:28 AM
|  | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,656
Country: Thanks: 430
Thanked 1,060 Times in 961 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ssadi This a question from complex number chapter of fp3
Find the following in the form a+ib, a,b member of real number set:
(a) arccos 4 (b) arcsin 2 (c) arcsin i
I tried to these sums by: x=arccos4, so cosx=4, so e^(ix)-e^-(ix)=8
The answers: (a) My answer:+/- i arcosh 4 Book's answer: 2m*pi +/- i arcosh 4 (b) My answer: +/- arcosh 2(i am not sure how i get that) Book's answer: (4m+1)*pi/2 +/- i arcosh 2 (c) My answer: i ln ((-2+/- sqrt 5)/2)) Book's answer: n*pi + i arsinh [(-1)^n]
So I gathered that I am missing something major here. Please anyone tell me the correct method to do these sums, thus enabling me to try it out myself. Just tell me the method, please  This is my first sums of this kind:woo:
P.s. i=imaginary. | The first thing you might want to check is in your first step it should be
Or what you might want to try is solving  for  by letting  . But be sure to remember that  is a many valued (many-to-one) function so there isn't going to be just one number as the answer. | | The following users thank Mathstud28 for this useful post: | |  | 
November 27th, 2008, 10:30 AM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 89
Country: Thanks: 43
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathstud28 The first thing you might want to check is in your first step it should be
Or what you might want to try is solving  for  by letting  . But be sure to remember that  is a many valued (many-to-one) function so there isn't going to be just one number as the answer. | oh i typed wrong here, in the sum i used e^ix + e^-ix :embarassed: | 
November 27th, 2008, 10:31 AM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 89
Country: Thanks: 43
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathstud28 The first thing you might want to check is in your first step it should be
Or what you might want to try is solving  for  by letting  . But be sure to remember that  is a many valued (many-to-one) function so there isn't going to be just one number as the answer. | and from where the m and n comes into book's answer? I am really nonplussed. | 
November 27th, 2008, 10:32 AM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 89
Country: Thanks: 43
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathstud28 The first thing you might want to check is in your first step it should be
Or what you might want to try is solving  for  by letting  . But be sure to remember that  is a many valued (many-to-one) function so there isn't going to be just one number as the answer. | Isn't there a general formula or something i can use to do this type of sum? | 
November 27th, 2008, 10:47 AM
|  | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,656
Country: Thanks: 430
Thanked 1,060 Times in 961 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ssadi and from where the m and n comes into book's answer? I am really nonplussed. | That is because as I said, the imaginary exponential function is multi-valued, Quote:
Originally Posted by ssadi oh i typed wrong here, in the sum i used e^ix + e^-ix :embarassed: | Dont worry! We all make typos! Quote:
Originally Posted by ssadi Isn't there a general formula or something i can use to do this type of sum? | Try my suggestion and see if it helps.
There is no need to have three seperate posts | | The following users thank Mathstud28 for this useful post: | |  | 
November 28th, 2008, 05:40 AM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 89
Country: Thanks: 43
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathstud28 That is because as I said, the imaginary exponential function is multi-valued,
Dont worry! We all make typos!
Try my suggestion and see if it helps.
There is no need to have three seperate posts | My ideas were coming randomly, hence the array of posts 
I am not actually familiar with multi-valuation of imaginary exponential funtion, but I think i can solve the equation in the trigonometric form. But I am not sure how sin x=0 can lead to (4m+1)*pi/2 as the value of x, especially when 3/2 pi is a solution of x. Can you give me a site which addresses how to get the general formula for cos x=0, sinx =0 , sin x=c etc. I will be perfectly happy then | 
November 28th, 2008, 06:56 AM
| | Super Member | | Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 815
Country: Thanks: 53
Thanked 329 Times in 290 Posts
| | The key to understanding these is understanding the multi-valued logarithm function. Until you understand that, you're going to have problems throughout Complex Analysis. Now
That formula is a big deal because both logarithm and the root object are multivalued:
Then:
This then bifurcates into two infinite sets of values:
Where in this case  and
__________________ "I am beset by the ironies in my life" | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:49 AM. | | |