| 
December 31st, 2008, 06:23 PM
|  | Eater of Worlds | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Chaneysville, PA
Posts: 2,853
Country: Thanks: 120
Thanked 1,098 Times in 986 Posts
| | gamma and e^(-x^2) You know, I was just playing around and noticed something. I am sure you all
have thought of this before, but I just 'discovered this'. I always integrated  by the polar method.
But if we use gamma it is easy.
Knowing that
we can use the definition:
Therefore,
Since  is even, we get
I know, I know, it's obvious to you all and older than Moses. But I had not
thought about using gamma before for this famous integral and it just
dawned on me. I always just used the old polar thing and never worried
about another method. Stuck in that rut, I reckon. But, if there are those
out there who like this, here it is. | 
December 31st, 2008, 06:31 PM
|  | Math Engineering Student | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Santiago
Posts: 3,027
Country: Thanks: 82
Thanked 1,350 Times in 1,077 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by galactus
But if we use gamma it is easy.
Knowing that  | How'd ya prove this little fact? | 
December 31st, 2008, 06:55 PM
|  | Eater of Worlds | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Chaneysville, PA
Posts: 2,853
Country: Thanks: 120
Thanked 1,098 Times in 986 Posts
| | You want me to prove that?. That is a famous gamma identity, so I did not bother proving every aspect.
But, if you would like to see it, let me get back. Okey-doke. I always just used it and took it for granted and never bothered proving it.
But, I am thinking we can play on the old polar thing to show it.
To be lazy, I would just use  and let n=1/2.
I know, you want something more tangible.
Let's see, we could start with
Then, sub in  .
I will finish later. Got to go for a second. | 
December 31st, 2008, 07:38 PM
|  | Eater of Worlds | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Chaneysville, PA
Posts: 2,853
Country: Thanks: 120
Thanked 1,098 Times in 986 Posts
| | Well, Kriz, it appears I ended up using the polar thing to do that. But I think you knew that, didn't you?.
To conclude:
or
Now, we use the polar thing. So, I learned myself something with a little prodding from the Krizmeister. Cheers.
I suppose that infernal polar was hidden there afterall.
I can not believe I had never bothered doing these before. Oh well, I derived something I should have a long time ago. Especially, since I like the Gamma function so much. | 
December 31st, 2008, 08:14 PM
|  | Math Engineering Student | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Santiago
Posts: 3,027
Country: Thanks: 82
Thanked 1,350 Times in 1,077 Posts
| | Ohhh, I'm sorry, I misread the question, it's actually calculating again the gaussian integral.
Cheers and Happy New Year!!!! | 
December 31st, 2008, 09:00 PM
|  | Eater of Worlds | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Chaneysville, PA
Posts: 2,853
Country: Thanks: 120
Thanked 1,098 Times in 986 Posts
| | Since we're on Gamma, derive this one:
This is the duplication formula for Gamma.
Try using the identity  and put
Happy New Years | 
December 31st, 2008, 09:07 PM
|  | Math Engineering Student | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Santiago
Posts: 3,027
Country: Thanks: 82
Thanked 1,350 Times in 1,077 Posts
| | Don't worry, I'm also a good friend of Gamma function.
But it's actually a bit interesting in finding a closed form for | 
December 31st, 2008, 09:12 PM
|  | Eater of Worlds | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Chaneysville, PA
Posts: 2,853
Country: Thanks: 120
Thanked 1,098 Times in 986 Posts
| | You mean this one:  ?. | 
December 31st, 2008, 09:12 PM
|  | Math Engineering Student | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Santiago
Posts: 3,027
Country: Thanks: 82
Thanked 1,350 Times in 1,077 Posts
| | Yes. | 
December 31st, 2008, 09:55 PM
|  | Eater of Worlds | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Chaneysville, PA
Posts: 2,853
Country: Thanks: 120
Thanked 1,098 Times in 986 Posts
| | Well, Kriz, let' see. I have been working on it while I was waiting on your reponnse and gong to the bathroom.
It is getting late, Kriz. I am going to skip some major steps and join you tomorrow. Gotta go. But I have this so far. Need to explain some steps further if need be.
From
Then,
We need to show that  which I think can be gotten from
because
Therefore, we get
Plugging this in the above gives:
Hope you can follow that. I will touch it up tomorrow.
It's getting late and my brain is beginning to see p's and q's everywhere.
Cheers, Kriz | 
January 2nd, 2009, 01:22 PM
|  | A Cute Angle | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: P(I'm here)=1/3, P(I'm there)=t+1/3
Posts: 5,006
Country: Thanks: 504
Thanked 2,892 Times in 2,376 Posts
| | The method I really love for calculating this integral is considering the function :
__________________ Everything is possible. The impossible just takes longer. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
shinhidora production To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:43 PM. | | |