| 
January 11th, 2009, 03:28 PM
|  | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 55
Country: Thanks: 35
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Set of questions The right answers for these are appreciated (Not asking for a full work through) but I'd like to compare what I'm doing with what I should be doing.
1. [i] Starting from the definition of  in terms of  , show that 
[ii]Given that cosh 2x = k, where k > 1, express each of cosh x and sinh x in terms of k. Notes about this question: I'm completely lost with this one. No idea what it's asking me to do... or rather what's the final goal. The english is a bit weird for me I guess =/
2. 
[i] Find the equations of the asymptotes of the curve for the above equation.
[ii]Prove that the values of y between which there are no point on the curve are -5 and 3. Notes about this question: I attempted substituting and getting x as subject of the formula but that's not a feat I can accomplish, if it's even possible. After attempting to work out the fraction (long division) it turned out to give  and that gets me nowhere afaik. So need some help on this matter.
3. Use the formulae for  and  to show that Notes about this question: I have the formulae for both of those, but unluckily I can't figure out the working required. Need a bit of an indepth explanation with how to manipulate those
4. Now this is for my weak spot. I just don't get on well with D.Es.
Find the general solution of the differential equation giving y in terms of x in your answer
I think those are the ones I couldn't work out from the paper.
Edit: Nope they're not, another one...
5. [i]Show that [ii] Hence find an expression in terms of n for Notes about this question: First parts is easy enough for me to finish it, but finding the expression isn't... at all.
Last edited by Lonehwolf; January 12th, 2009 at 03:20 AM.
Reason: New problem
| 
January 11th, 2009, 04:58 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 32
Country: Thanks: 9
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonehwolf The right answers for these are appreciated (Not asking for a full work through) but I'd like to compare what I'm doing with what I should be doing.
1. [i] Starting from the definition of  in terms of  , show that 
[ii]Given that cosh 2x = k, where k > 1, express each of cosh x and sinh x in terms of k. Notes about this question: I'm completely lost with this one. No idea what it's asking me to do... or rather what's the final goal. The english is a bit weird for me I guess =/ | i)
So:
and:
ii)
so,
Finally:
Now
so use this to find sinhx in terms of k.
Last edited by skamoni; January 11th, 2009 at 05:13 PM.
| | The following users thank skamoni for this useful post: | |  | 
January 12th, 2009, 01:16 AM
|  | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 55
Country: Thanks: 35
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | First part is pretty clear, thanks.
Struggling a little bit with sinh x in the second part. Any help on the other questions is greatly appreciated especially the curve sketching one
Answer for that part for me was:
Doesn't look very neat IMO, so I may need some help with this once again | 
January 12th, 2009, 01:34 AM
|  | A Cute Angle | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: P(I'm here)=1/3, P(I'm there)=t+1/3
Posts: 5,051
Country: Thanks: 506
Thanked 2,916 Times in 2,399 Posts
| | Hello, Yup, there is a problem here >< I think you confused yourself with the squares ! 
Hence
So 
Don't forget the  ,  can be negative, whereas  can't.
__________________ Everything is possible. The impossible just takes longer. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
shinhidora production To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | | The following users thank Moo for this useful post: | |  | 
January 12th, 2009, 01:38 AM
|  | Wesnoth Rookie | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: IISc, Bangalore
Posts: 1,343
Country: Thanks: 440
Thanked 654 Times in 548 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonehwolf
4. Now this is for my weak spot. I just don't get on well with D.Es.
Find the general solution of the differential equation
[math]\frac{dy}{dx}-\frac{y}{x}=x giving y in terms of x in your answer
I think those are the ones I couldn't work out from the paper. | To solve this problem, you should know the integrating factor trick. Learn it and you can apply it many places. In this case the integrating factor is  .
Then the D.E will reduce to 
The following alternative trick comes from practice. Make the substitution  , then  . So your equation will read  which is easily solvable.... Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonehwolf 5. [i]Show that [ii] Hence find an expression in terms of n for Notes about this question: First parts is easy enough for me to finish it, but finding the expression isn't... at all. | The general term of the summation is  gives  gives
Thus you can write  as 
As you can see, you can cancel terms to get  as
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Algebra is the offer made by the devil to the mathematician. The devil says: `I will give you this powerful machine, it will answer any question you like. All you need to do is give me your soul: give up geometry and you will have this marvellous machine.' —Michael Atiyah | | The following users thank Isomorphism for this useful post: | |  | 
January 12th, 2009, 01:39 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 32
Country: Thanks: 9
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonehwolf The right answers for these are appreciated (Not asking for a full work through) but I'd like to compare what I'm doing with what I should be doing.
2. 
[i] Find the equations of the asymptotes of the curve for the above equation.
[ii]Prove that the values of y between which there are no point on the curve are -5 and 3. Notes about this question: I attempted substituting and getting x as subject of the formula but that's not a feat I can accomplish, if it's even possible. After attempting to work out the fraction (long division) it turned out to give  and that gets me nowhere afaik. So need some help on this matter. | That's the right idea. There's obviously a vertical asymptote at
To find the other asymptote write write the equation as  and notice that as:
so the other asymptote is
Last edited by skamoni; January 12th, 2009 at 01:58 AM.
| 
January 12th, 2009, 03:02 AM
|  | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 55
Country: Thanks: 35
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Moo Hello,
Yup, there is a problem here >< I think you confused yourself with the squares ! 
Hence
So 
Don't forget the  ,  can be negative, whereas  can't. | Damn that was stupid of me >.< I was attempting to manipulate  into sinh x from the start rather than at the end. Stupid stupid stupid. Hate how simple questions turn out impossible cause I take the wrong path, practice makes perfect is my only way I guess. Quote:
Originally Posted by skamoni That's the right idea. There's obviously a vertical asymptote at
To find the other asymptote write write the equation as  and notice that as:
so the other asymptote is  | Regarding x = -1 I understood as much. I didnt' state it since I was confusing myself with whether the nominator should be smaller or larger than the denominator, or have no effect at all. That's differentiation mixing in I think.
Regarding the other asymptote, I can't really get how you worked out the infinity issue.
If 
I'd guess all of the following  would make more sense.
If  was the case, while keeping in mind that  , then  , and I don't see how that can be stated on its own  .
I must be missing something once again -.- Quote:
Originally Posted by Isomorphism To solve this problem, you should know the integrating factor trick. Learn it and you can apply it many places. In this case the integrating factor is  .
Then the D.E will reduce to 
The following alternative trick comes from practice. Make the substitution  , then  . So your equation will read  which is easily solvable....
The general term of the summation is  gives  gives
Thus you can write  as 
As you can see, you can cancel terms to get  as  | Fully understood! THANKS! | 
January 12th, 2009, 03:19 AM
|  | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 55
Country: Thanks: 35
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Damn that was a big post including quotes and all... Regarding the third question I still need help.
I broke my brain to try typing it out in latex, chances are it will phail:
Use the formulae for  and  to show that
But hail preview post, it wins! ;D | 
January 12th, 2009, 03:20 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 32
Country: Thanks: 9
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonehwolf Damn that was stupid of me >.< I was attempting to manipulate  into sinh x from the start rather than at the end. Stupid stupid stupid. Hate how simple questions turn out impossible cause I take the wrong path, practice makes perfect is my only way I guess.
Regarding x = -1 I understood as much. I didnt' state it since I was confusing myself with whether the nominator should be smaller or larger than the denominator, or have no effect at all. That's differentiation mixing in I think.
Regarding the other asymptote, I can't really get how you worked out the infinity issue.
If 
I'd guess all of the following  would make more sense.
If  was the case, while keeping in mind that  , then  , and I don't see how that can be stated on its own  .
I must be missing something once again -.-
Fully understood! THANKS!  | Sorry i should have put 
The asymptote will be the part of the equation (after long division) that doesn't tend to zero. So as x becomes larger, y will tend to a value near to  , put in some values and see for yourself.
Read this: Asymptote - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Also for 3, use:  and  and
Last edited by skamoni; January 12th, 2009 at 03:30 AM.
| | The following users thank skamoni for this useful post: | |  | 
January 12th, 2009, 05:35 AM
|  | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 55
Country: Thanks: 35
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by skamoni Sorry i should have put 
The asymptote will be the part of the equation (after long division) that doesn't tend to zero. So as x becomes larger, y will tend to a value near to  , put in some values and see for yourself.
Read this: Asymptote - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Also for 3, use:  and  and  | Damn you're good O.O
Regarding wiki... I just don't understand what they write, they confuse me a little bit more. I do know that aysmptotes are areas which are not touched by the curves, and they can be along the axis, parallel to them, or even oblique, as you linked with that one
Still I managed to get the equation once you cleared out you meant  instead of y.
Regarding the Summation part, it didn't match:
Find, point and fix all stupid mistakes in my working please? -.- | 
January 12th, 2009, 06:13 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 32
Country: Thanks: 9
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
| | | | The following users thank skamoni for this useful post: | |  | 
January 12th, 2009, 06:25 AM
|  | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 55
Country: Thanks: 35
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by skamoni | Lolz I forgot to write the division. Thanks ^^ All problems are solved now I guess :> | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:38 PM. | | |