Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > University Math Help > Calculus
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old May 28th, 2007, 06:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Shabu City
Posts: 381
Country:
Thanks: 440
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
^_^Engineer_Adam^_^ is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker View Post

Find the integrals.

4*)\int e^{\sqrt{x}} It has a star what do you think!?


10)\int \frac{1}{1-e^{2x}}dx Hard
hi
i cant seem to solv this two problems can u please provide solution to these?
arrgh
Reply With Quote
The following users thank ^_^Engineer_Adam^_^ for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
Advertisement
 
  #32  
Old May 28th, 2007, 09:32 AM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country:
Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,754 Times in 3,070 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ^_^Engineer_Adam^_^ View Post
hi
i cant seem to solv this two problems can u please provide solution to these?
arrgh
\int e^{\sqrt{x}} dx
I will make the substitution u=\sqrt{x}. But if I do that, I always need to know what its derivative is, u' = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}}.

If you look into the integral this factor does not appear. So what do we do? We make it appear. Multiply the numerator and denominator by this expression:

\int e^{\sqrt{x}}\cdot 2\sqrt{x} \cdot \frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}} dx
Now if we use u=\sqrt{x} then, u'=\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}} which is good because it appears as a factor and 2\sqrt{x} = 2u.
Make the substitution,
\int e^u \cdot 2u \cdot u' dx = \int 2u e^u du.
You can now do this integral by parts.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain power
over people is to assure the people that they are ruling
themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully
submissive slaves." - Joseph Sobran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
The following users thank ThePerfectHacker for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
  #33  
Old May 30th, 2007, 04:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Shabu City
Posts: 381
Country:
Thanks: 440
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
^_^Engineer_Adam^_^ is on a distinguished road
Default solution for number 10

i get it now
\int \frac{1}{1-e^{2x}}dx

\int \frac{1 - e^{2x}+e^{2x}}{1-e^{2x}}dx

\int \frac{1-e^{2x}}{1-e^{2x}}dx +  \frac{e^{2x}}{1-e^{2x}}dx

x + \int \frac{e^{2x}}{u} \frac{du}{-2e^{2x}}

x - \frac{1}{2}\ln(1-e^{2x}) +C

but the integrator says

x - \frac{1}{2}\ln(e^{2x}-1)
hmm
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old May 30th, 2007, 04:58 PM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country:
Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,754 Times in 3,070 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ^_^Engineer_Adam^_^ View Post
i get it now
\int \frac{1}{1-e^{2x}}dx

\int \frac{1 - e^{2x}+e^{2x}}{1-e^{2x}}dx

\int \frac{1-e^{2x}}{1-e^{2x}}dx +  \frac{e^{2x}}{1-e^{2x}}dx

x + \int \frac{e^{2x}}{u} \frac{du}{-2e^{2x}}

x - \frac{1}{2}\ln(1-e^{2x}) +C

but the integrator says

x - \frac{1}{2}\ln(e^{2x}-1)
hmm
Because you need to use | \, |.
In that case,
\ln |1-e^{2x}| = \ln |e^{2x}-1|
Because,
|a-b|=|b-a|
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain power
over people is to assure the people that they are ruling
themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully
submissive slaves." - Joseph Sobran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
The following users thank ThePerfectHacker for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
  #35  
Old June 30th, 2007, 01:06 AM
tukeywilliams's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 307
Country:
Thanks: 49
Thanked 106 Times in 95 Posts
tukeywilliams will become famous soon enoughtukeywilliams will become famous soon enough
Default

just wanted to point out: isn't a sequence a function defined as f: \mathbb{Z^{+}} \rightarrow A which means a sequence in the set A? So the codomain doesn't have to be \mathbb{R} but can be an arbitrary set A? Actually \mathbb{N} and \mathbb{Z^{+}} are equivalent right? And a sequence is null when \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} f(n) = 0 when \forall \epsilon \in \mathbb{R^{+}}, \exists N \in \mathbb{Z^{+}}, \forall n \in \mathbb{Z^{+}} (n \geq N \Rightarrow |f(n)| < \epsilon). Also, I like to think of functions as follows: pretend you have a box subdivided into smaller boxes. These smaller boxes represent the elements of the codomain, and the points in the boxes represent the elements of the domain. So a function orders the points in the smaller boxes.

Last edited by tukeywilliams; June 30th, 2007 at 01:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old June 30th, 2007, 07:58 PM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country:
Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,754 Times in 3,070 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tukeywilliams View Post
just wanted to point out: isn't a sequence a function defined as f: \mathbb{Z^{+}} \rightarrow A which means a sequence in the set A? So the codomain doesn't have to be \mathbb{R} but can be an arbitrary set A? Actually \mathbb{N} and \mathbb{Z^{+}} are equivalent right? And a sequence is null when \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} f(n) = 0 when \forall \epsilon \in \mathbb{R^{+}}, \exists N \in \mathbb{Z^{+}}, \forall n \in \mathbb{Z^{+}} (n \geq N \Rightarrow |f(n)| < \epsilon). Also, I like to think of functions as follows: pretend you have a box subdivided into smaller boxes. These smaller boxes represent the elements of the codomain, and the points in the boxes represent the elements of the domain. So a function orders the points in the smaller boxes.
I was talking about a "real sequence" in that case f:\mathbb{N}\to \mathbb{R}.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain power
over people is to assure the people that they are ruling
themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully
submissive slaves." - Joseph Sobran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old January 4th, 2008, 01:45 PM
colby2152's Avatar
GAMMA Mathematics

 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 1,196
Country:
Thanks: 596
Thanked 522 Times in 404 Posts
colby2152 is a glorious beacon of lightcolby2152 is a glorious beacon of lightcolby2152 is a glorious beacon of lightcolby2152 is a glorious beacon of lightcolby2152 is a glorious beacon of lightcolby2152 is a glorious beacon of light
Send a message via AIM to colby2152
Default

TPH, your notes are extremely thorough and detailed, and are an excellent source for anyone studying Calculus. I hope you don't mind that I added some of my "simpler" Calculus notes to this forum. Like yours, my notes are not meant for students taking Advanced Calculus courses such as Real Analysis. I hope I am not stepping on your toes!
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Mathematical contributions of all kinds are welcome - IT IS LIVE AND READY!
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old January 4th, 2008, 01:49 PM
Jhevon's Avatar
vs Jhevon
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 11,104
Country:
Thanks: 2,610
Thanked 4,271 Times in 3,970 Posts
Jhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by colby2152 View Post
TPH, your notes are extremely thorough and detailed, and are an excellent source for anyone studying Calculus. I hope you don't mind that I added some of my "simpler" Calculus notes to this forum. Like yours, my notes are not meant for students taking Advanced Calculus courses such as Real Analysis. I hope I am not stepping on your toes!
that would be all good and well i believe. in fact, we encourage users to do things like that. that's why we have a mathwiki page (but it's not fully functional yet). as long as you're not "re-inventing the wheel" (that is, going over exactly the same stuff TPH covered, unless of course, you feel he left something out) i don't see why you can't post notes. you may want to do it in a different thread though, this is TPH's thread.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old February 7th, 2008, 04:13 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 13
Country:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
mustkara is on a distinguished road
Default Good Reference Textbook

I believe the textbook

Introduction to Stochastic Calculus with Applications, 1st Edition

will be useful for you to study Mathematics

Good Luck and wish help for you.

hehe ^_^
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old May 15th, 2009, 03:24 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 267
Country:
Thanks: 107
Thanked 36 Times in 20 Posts
scorpion007 is on a distinguished road
Default

Just some spelling corrections: Differenciable, Differencial, Differenciation should all be Differentiable, Differential, Differentiation respectively. Basically, the C's should be T's.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old May 15th, 2009, 12:48 PM
Moo's Avatar
Moo Moo is offline
A Cute Angle
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: P(I'm here)=1/3, P(I'm there)=t+1/3
Posts: 5,049
Country:
Thanks: 506
Thanked 2,915 Times in 2,398 Posts
Moo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond reputeMoo has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpion007 View Post
Just some spelling corrections: Differenciable, Differencial, Differenciation should all be Differentiable, Differential, Differentiation respectively. Basically, the C's should be T's.
Oh, that's just TPH, you shouldn't bother that much for it

Another example that comes in mind is that he once said "diagnol" for "diagonal". It's common, but it doesn't alter the quality
__________________
Everything is possible. The impossible just takes longer.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

shinhidora production

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.