Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > MHF Lounge > Chat Room
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old January 31st, 2006, 10:38 AM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,177
Country:
Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,779 Times in 3,073 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkanderH
Lukasiewicz
Kolomogrov ??

And how about some more contemporary scientisits

Nash
Penrose
Wolfram??
Nash he is an economist, he does not get the honor of joining that list. I gave some classical mathemations in the previous posts. No one responded Still waiting.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain power
over people is to assure the people that they are ruling
themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully
submissive slaves." - Joseph Sobran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Advertisement
 
  #32  
Old January 31st, 2006, 03:19 PM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,177
Country:
Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,779 Times in 3,073 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I waited long enough, I am placing Dirichilet on the list. Unless of course someone objects. (Check the first post for a completer standing).
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain power
over people is to assure the people that they are ruling
themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully
submissive slaves." - Joseph Sobran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  #33  
Old January 31st, 2006, 08:22 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SkanderH is on a distinguished road
Default About Nash

Nash was a mathematician. He only got the Nobel prize in economics because there is no Nobel prize in math and his new mathematical ideas were applied to economical problems. He worked on game theory and algebraic manifolds as well as decision theory.
Check his web page
http://www.math.princeton.edu/jfnj/
He certainly doens't deserve to be looked down upon just because he did some applied mathematics!!

Anobody else agree with Nash as a candidate

Last edited by SkanderH; January 31st, 2006 at 08:29 PM.
  #34  
Old January 31st, 2006, 08:37 PM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,177
Country:
Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,779 Times in 3,073 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkanderH
Nash was a mathematician. He only got the Nobel prize in economics because there is no Nobel prize in math and his new mathematical ideas were applied to economical problems. He worked on game theory and algebraic manifolds as well as decision theory.
Check his web page
http://www.math.princeton.edu/jfnj/
He certainly doens't deserve to be looked down upon just because he did some applied mathematics!!

Anobody else agree with Nash as a candidate
I will only place Nash on the list, if others agree. I do not see him as a great mathematician, but that might be because I do not know much about him.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain power
over people is to assure the people that they are ruling
themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully
submissive slaves." - Joseph Sobran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  #35  
Old January 31st, 2006, 08:40 PM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,177
Country:
Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,779 Times in 3,073 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topsquark
Oh! and let us not forget "The Fabulous" Bernoulli brothers who made so many contributions that no one can remember which one did what.

-Dan
Maybe we can place Johann Bernoulli on that list?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain power
over people is to assure the people that they are ruling
themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully
submissive slaves." - Joseph Sobran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  #36  
Old February 1st, 2006, 12:16 AM
MHF Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,631
Country:
Thanks: 8
Thanked 416 Times in 398 Posts
ticbol is just really niceticbol is just really niceticbol is just really niceticbol is just really niceticbol is just really nice
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkanderH
Nash was a mathematician. He only got the Nobel prize in economics because there is no Nobel prize in math and his new mathematical ideas were applied to economical problems. He worked on game theory and algebraic manifolds as well as decision theory.
Check his web page
http://www.math.princeton.edu/jfnj/
He certainly doens't deserve to be looked down upon just because he did some applied mathematics!!

Anobody else agree with Nash as a candidate
Nash? von Neumann? Albert Einstein?!
Man, Einstein! and he is not there?

That list is a farce, to say the least.

Not being a racist, I see no Arab, Indian, Chinese in there. Those 3 races have great Math people. Then, and even now at present, and in the future.
  #37  
Old February 1st, 2006, 12:26 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SkanderH is on a distinguished road
Default About middle eastern, indian and chinese math

Quote:
Originally Posted by ticbol
Nash? von Neumann? Albert Einstein?!
Man, Einstein! and he is not there?

That list is a farce, to say the least.

Not being a racist, I see no Arab, Indian, Chinese in there. Those 3 races have great Math people. Then, and even now at present, and in the future.
You are right, the list is to western-centric (if there is such a word). I don't know much about Chinese and Indian math, but al-Khawarizmi should definiltely be included in the list, he invented algebra (ilm al-jabr) and algorithms.

Last edited by SkanderH; February 1st, 2006 at 12:26 AM. Reason: mistakes and no title
  #38  
Old February 1st, 2006, 01:49 AM
CaptainBlack's Avatar
Grand Panjandrum
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South of England
Posts: 12,190
Country:
Thanks: 770
Thanked 3,953 Times in 3,191 Posts
CaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ticbol
Nash? von Neumann? Albert Einstein?!
Man, Einstein! and he is not there?

That list is a farce, to say the least.

Not being a racist, I see no Arab, Indian, Chinese in there. Those 3 races have great Math people. Then, and even now at present, and in the future.
Ramanjuan is at least on the candidates list.

RonL
__________________
Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.

Giordano Bruno
  #39  
Old February 1st, 2006, 02:22 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SkanderH is on a distinguished road
Default Ramanjuan

Can you tell us more about Ramanjuan?
  #40  
Old February 1st, 2006, 01:28 PM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,177
Country:
Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,779 Times in 3,073 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainBlack
Ramanjuan is at least on the candidates list.

RonL
Agreed, Ramanjuan is on the list. 3 more left! Look at the first post for the latest updates.


Let me just remind the voters that I am making a poll for math. Not for physics nor for applied math, that is something else. Yes, I agree that Einstein knew a lot of math. The math involed in General Relatively is intense use of Riemann's theories, which is complicated stuff. However, Einstein did not do anything for the work of math. Yes, it is true he was one of the greatest scientist, but not at all close to a mathematician. Again this poll is purely mathematical.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain power
over people is to assure the people that they are ruling
themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully
submissive slaves." - Joseph Sobran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by ThePerfectHacker; February 1st, 2006 at 01:43 PM.
  #41  
Old February 1st, 2006, 01:40 PM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,177
Country:
Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,779 Times in 3,073 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkanderH
Can you tell us more about Ramanjuan?
Yes, Ramanjuan was the greatest Indian mathematician. He was born in 1887 and died in 1920 in United States. Ramanjuan was extremely close friends with Godfried Harold Hardy, a number theorist. Hardy describes Ramanjuan like a person which he has never seen before. Ramanujuan ability to see complicated solutions with ease was one of his unusual abilities. Later in life Hardy compared Ramanjuan to Euler and Jacobi (the greatest algorists). When Ramanjuan was a young he read a difficult book on pure math called "Synopsis of Pure Mathematics" it mostly consisted of complicated problems with no proofs, Ramanjuan mastered it easily. When Ramanjuan died notebooks of his remained. The notebooks contained some on the most strange identitites ever seen, mostly involving continued fractions. It is still unclear what steps Ramanjuan took to create these identities. An interesting fact, Ramanjuan found the quadtric formula at the age of 15! (not factorical )
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain power
over people is to assure the people that they are ruling
themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully
submissive slaves." - Joseph Sobran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  #42  
Old February 1st, 2006, 06:16 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SkanderH is on a distinguished road
Default AL Khawarizmi

I reiterate that Al-Khawarizmi, should be on the list, he is considered "the father of algebra".
  #43  
Old February 1st, 2006, 07:38 PM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,177
Country:
Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,779 Times in 3,073 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkanderH
I reiterate that Al-Khawarizmi, should be on the list, he is considered "the father of algebra".
The "father of algebra" is Diophantus of Alexandria now that is a name which I can place on that list.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain power
over people is to assure the people that they are ruling
themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully
submissive slaves." - Joseph Sobran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  #44  
Old February 1st, 2006, 08:08 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SkanderH is on a distinguished road
Default the father of algebra

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker
The "father of algebra" is Diophantus of Alexandria now that is a name which I can place on that list.
Given that the very word algebra comes form the title of Khawarizmi's book
"al-Kitāb al-mukhtasar fi hisab al-jabr wa’l-muqābalah"
al-jabr --> algebra (al-jabr is arabic for completion or correction)
I do not see how the honour goes to Diophantus instead (unless you beleive the racist rehtoric that the arabs "only" copied greek mathematics, which is flat wrong).
Mathematical historian Gandz gives this opinion of Khwarizmi's algebra:
"Khwarizmi's algebra is regarded as the foundation and cornerstone of the sciences. In a sense, Khwarizmi is more entitled to be called "the father of algebra" than Diophantus because Khwarizmi is the first to teach algebra in an elementary form and for its own sake, Diophantus is primarily concerned with the theory of numbers." S Gandz, The sources of al-Khwarizmi's algebra, Osiris, i (1936), 263-77.
  #45  
Old February 1st, 2006, 11:19 PM
CaptainBlack's Avatar
Grand Panjandrum
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South of England
Posts: 12,190
Country:
Thanks: 770
Thanked 3,953 Times in 3,191 Posts
CaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkanderH
Given that the very word algebra comes form the title of Khawarizmi's book
"al-Kitāb al-mukhtasar fi hisab al-jabr wa’l-muqābalah"
al-jabr --> algebra (al-jabr is arabic for completion or correction)
I do not see how the honour goes to Diophantus instead (unless you beleive the racist rehtoric that the arabs "only" copied greek mathematics, which is flat wrong).
Mathematical historian Gandz gives this opinion of Khwarizmi's algebra:
"Khwarizmi's algebra is regarded as the foundation and cornerstone of the sciences. In a sense, Khwarizmi is more entitled to be called "the father of algebra" than Diophantus because Khwarizmi is the first to teach algebra in an elementary form and for its own sake, Diophantus is primarily concerned with the theory of numbers." S Gandz, The sources of al-Khwarizmi's algebra, Osiris, i (1936), 263-77.
He gets my vote to go on the candidate list. I also suspect that other
Islamic candidates are missing from the list because their works are not as
well known in Europe and the Americas as they deserve.

The same must of course be true of pre 20th century Chinese and Indian
mathematicians.

RonL
__________________
Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.

Giordano Bruno

Last edited by CaptainBlack; February 1st, 2006 at 11:28 PM.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.