Solving a nonhomogeneous second order ODE using Laplace transform
So I know
I am pretty sure I am right up to this part and I know I have to use partial fractions, but everytime I do I get a different answer and they are never close to what the answer key's answer is:
Much help would be appreciated!
__________________ If I don't get some shelter, oh yeah, I'm gonna fade away.
I am pretty sure I am right up to this part and I know I have to use partial fractions, but everytime I do I get a different answer and they are never close to what the answer key's answer is:
Much help would be appreciated!
Well, you need to get the correct partial fraction decomposition and that's just paleontological spade work. After which you get:
and the inversion is simple. However, the 6 is clearly wrong (it should be a 2) so I suspect there's a small error somewhere in your expression for L[y].
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious.
The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti)
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by mr fantastic; November 3rd, 2009 at 01:57 AM.
Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics. Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.