Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > University Math Help > Differential Equations
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 6th, 2009, 06:24 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 66
Country:
Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
harbottle is on a distinguished road
Default Inverse Laplace Transform

Hi,

I need to find the inverse Laplace transform of

F(s) = s^{-2} \tanh(sT/2).

I suspect I have to use the period definition for Laplace transforms but I can't see how to make it fit. Any tips?

Last edited by harbottle; November 6th, 2009 at 07:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old November 6th, 2009, 06:33 PM
mr fantastic's Avatar
Flow Master

 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 13,480
Country:
Thanks: 2,974
Thanked 5,244 Times in 4,595 Posts
mr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harbottle View Post
Hi,

I need to find the inverse Laplace transform of

F(s) = s^{-2} \tanh(nT/2).

I suspect I have to use the period definition for Laplace transforms but I can't see how to make it fit. Any tips?
There is no s in your tanh function ....?
__________________
There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious.

The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti)

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 6th, 2009, 07:11 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 66
Country:
Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
harbottle is on a distinguished road
Default

Sorry, typo'd . Was thinking of periods while I was writing it down, and an n found its way in there somewhere
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 7th, 2009, 02:59 AM
mr fantastic's Avatar
Flow Master

 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 13,480
Country:
Thanks: 2,974
Thanked 5,244 Times in 4,595 Posts
mr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harbottle View Post
Hi,

I need to find the inverse Laplace transform of

F(s) = s^{-2} \tanh(sT/2).

I suspect I have to use the period definition for Laplace transforms but I can't see how to make it fit. Any tips?
Are you familiar with:

The Bromwich inversion integral.
The residue theorem.
Fourier series.

Because these are the things you would need to understand if you were to be able to follow the outline of the type of solution I have in mind and fill in the details.
__________________
There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious.

The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti)

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old November 7th, 2009, 03:35 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 66
Country:
Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
harbottle is on a distinguished road
Default

I haven't used the residue theorem for a while, I know. The Bromwich integral I know by definition, but I don't think we're expected to use it (and haven't been taught how).

Anyway, I'll be keen to try whatever you're thinking, or if you know a way of doing it without these things, that's fine too.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old November 7th, 2009, 03:39 AM
mr fantastic's Avatar
Flow Master

 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 13,480
Country:
Thanks: 2,974
Thanked 5,244 Times in 4,595 Posts
mr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harbottle View Post
I haven't used the residue theorem for a while, I know. The Bromwich integral I know by definition, but I don't think we're expected to use it (and haven't been taught how).

Anyway, I'll be keen to try whatever you're thinking, or if you know a way of doing it without these things, that's fine too.
There's no point my posting an outline of a solution if you have not learned the mathematics it requires. I might think of a less sophisticated way at some stage, or perhaps someone else will.
__________________
There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious.

The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti)

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old November 7th, 2009, 07:19 PM
chisigma's Avatar
Super Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Piacenza (Italy)
Posts: 711
Country:
Thanks: 23
Thanked 263 Times in 231 Posts
chisigma is a jewel in the roughchisigma is a jewel in the roughchisigma is a jewel in the roughchisigma is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harbottle View Post
Hi,

I need to find the inverse Laplace transform of

F(s) = s^{-2} \tanh(sT/2).

I suspect I have to use the period definition for Laplace transforms but I can't see how to make it fit. Any tips?
You are 'lucky' because in this case You don't need to know sophisticated tools like Bromwitch integral, residue theorem and so on but only to have 'little imagination' ...

The LT to be inverted is...

F(s)= \frac{1}{s^{2}}\cdot \tanh \frac{sT}{2} (1)

Now, taking into account that...

a) for |s|>0 the function \tanh (*) can be written as...

\tanh \frac{sT}{2} = \frac{1 - e^{-sT}}{1+e^{-sT}} = (1-e^{-sT})\cdot (1 - e^{-sT} + e^{-2sT} - \dots) (2)

b) is...

\mathcal{L}^{-1} \{\frac{1}{s^{2}}\cdot (1-e^{-sT}) \}=t \cdot H(t) -(t-T)\cdot H(t-T) (3)

... that is the function represented here...



... is easy enough verify with the aid of (2) that the inverse LT we are searching is the function (3) 'periodized with alternating signs' , i.e. the periodic function represented here...



So your 'intuition' was exact: we have a periodic function ...

Kind regards

\chi \sigma
__________________
My new avatar will remain until the sentence of the European Court that removes the crucifix from the italian schools will be revised...
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to chisigma For This Useful Post:
Donate to MHF
  #8  
Old November 7th, 2009, 08:12 PM
mr fantastic's Avatar
Flow Master

 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 13,480
Country:
Thanks: 2,974
Thanked 5,244 Times in 4,595 Posts
mr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond reputemr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chisigma View Post
You are 'lucky' because in this case You don't need to know sophisticated tools like Bromwitch integral, residue theorem and so on but only to have 'little imagination' ...

The LT to be inverted is...

F(s)= \frac{1}{s^{2}}\cdot \tanh \frac{sT}{2} (1)

Now, taking into account that...

a) for |s|>0 the function \tanh (*) can be written as...

\tanh \frac{sT}{2} = \frac{1 - e^{-sT}}{1+e^{-sT}} = (1-e^{-sT})\cdot (1 - e^{-sT} + e^{-2sT} - \dots) (2)

b) is...

\mathcal{L}^{-1} \{\frac{1}{s^{2}}\cdot (1-e^{-sT}) \}=t \cdot H(t) -(t-T)\cdot H(t-T) (3)

... that is the function represented here...



... is easy enough verify with the aid of (2) that the inverse LT we are searching is the function (3) 'periodized with alternating signs' , i.e. the periodic function represented here...



So your 'intuition' was exact: we have a periodic function ...

Kind regards

\chi \sigma
Nice reply. Clearly I have no imagination ....
__________________
There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious.

The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti)

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  • To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old November 8th, 2009, 07:02 AM
Super Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 815
Country:
Thanks: 53
Thanked 329 Times in 290 Posts
shawsend is just really niceshawsend is just really niceshawsend is just really niceshawsend is just really nice
Default

Hi. Just for fun:

\mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{1}{s^2}\tanh(sT/2)\right\}=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\mathop\int\limits_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty}e^{st}\frac{1}{s^2}\tanh(sT/2)ds

and with some effort, we can show a closed contour pinned at the line c+i\gamma and allowed to expand without bounds, reduces to the Bromwich integral and sum of the enclosed residues:

\mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{1}{s^2}\tanh(sT/2)\right\}=\mathop\text{Res}\limits_{z=0}\left\{e^{st}\frac{1}{s^2}\tanh(sT/2)\right\}+\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\mathop\text{Res}\limits_{z=z_n}\left\{e^{st}\frac{1}{s^2}\tanh(sT/2)\right\},\quad z_n=\pm\frac{(2n+1)\pi i}{T}

=\frac{T}{2}-\frac{4T}{\pi^2}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(2n+1)^2}\cos\left[\frac{(2n+1)\pi x}{T}\right]

and I suspect that is the Fourier series of the answer obtained by Chisigma and suggested by Mr. F.
__________________
"I am beset by the ironies in my life"

Last edited by shawsend; November 8th, 2009 at 07:29 AM. Reason: added +- to residues
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shawsend For This Useful Post:
Donate to MHF
  #10  
Old November 8th, 2009, 09:01 AM
CaptainBlack's Avatar
Grand Panjandrum
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South of England
Posts: 12,216
Country:
Thanks: 774
Thanked 3,968 Times in 3,202 Posts
CaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harbottle View Post
Hi,

I need to find the inverse Laplace transform of

F(s) = s^{-2} \tanh(sT/2).

I suspect I have to use the period definition for Laplace transforms but I can't see how to make it fit. Any tips?
You can also look this up in a table of LT and ILT, it is item 32.158 in the Laplace Transform chapter of the Schaum Mathematical Handbook.

(interestingly enough WolframAlpha does not know this!)

CB
__________________
Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.

Giordano Bruno
Reply With Quote
The following users thank CaptainBlack for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
  #11  
Old November 10th, 2009, 01:06 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 66
Country:
Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
harbottle is on a distinguished road
Default

Nice! That looks easy now with \chi\sigma's hint.

And I'll have a look at your solution too shawsend though as Mr.F suggested I might have some difficulties.


Thanks everyone!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.