| 
November 6th, 2009, 07:24 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 65
Country: Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
| | Inverse Laplace Transform Hi,
I need to find the inverse Laplace transform of  .
I suspect I have to use the period definition for Laplace transforms but I can't see how to make it fit. Any tips?
Last edited by harbottle; November 6th, 2009 at 08:11 PM.
| 
November 6th, 2009, 07:33 PM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,239
Country: Thanks: 2,576
Thanked 4,763 Times in 4,195 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by harbottle Hi,
I need to find the inverse Laplace transform of  .
I suspect I have to use the period definition for Laplace transforms but I can't see how to make it fit. Any tips? | There is no s in your tanh function ....?
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
November 6th, 2009, 08:11 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 65
Country: Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
| | Sorry, typo'd  . Was thinking of periods while I was writing it down, and an n found its way in there somewhere | 
November 7th, 2009, 03:59 AM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,239
Country: Thanks: 2,576
Thanked 4,763 Times in 4,195 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by harbottle Hi,
I need to find the inverse Laplace transform of  .
I suspect I have to use the period definition for Laplace transforms but I can't see how to make it fit. Any tips? | Are you familiar with:
The Bromwich inversion integral.
The residue theorem.
Fourier series.
Because these are the things you would need to understand if you were to be able to follow the outline of the type of solution I have in mind and fill in the details.
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
November 7th, 2009, 04:35 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 65
Country: Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
| | I haven't used the residue theorem for a while, I know. The Bromwich integral I know by definition, but I don't think we're expected to use it (and haven't been taught how).
Anyway, I'll be keen to try whatever you're thinking, or if you know a way of doing it without these things, that's fine too. | 
November 7th, 2009, 04:39 AM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,239
Country: Thanks: 2,576
Thanked 4,763 Times in 4,195 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by harbottle I haven't used the residue theorem for a while, I know. The Bromwich integral I know by definition, but I don't think we're expected to use it (and haven't been taught how).
Anyway, I'll be keen to try whatever you're thinking, or if you know a way of doing it without these things, that's fine too. | There's no point my posting an outline of a solution if you have not learned the mathematics it requires. I might think of a less sophisticated way at some stage, or perhaps someone else will.
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
November 7th, 2009, 08:19 PM
|  | Super Member | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: near Piacenza (Italy)
Posts: 503
Country: Thanks: 17
Thanked 160 Times in 144 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by harbottle Hi,
I need to find the inverse Laplace transform of  .
I suspect I have to use the period definition for Laplace transforms but I can't see how to make it fit. Any tips? | You are 'lucky' because in this case You don't need to know sophisticated tools like Bromwitch integral, residue theorem and so on but only to have 'little imagination'  ...
The LT to be inverted is...  (1)
Now, taking into account that...
a) for  the function  can be written as...  (2)
b) is...  (3)
... that is the function represented here...
... is easy enough verify with the aid of (2) that the inverse LT we are searching is the function (3) 'periodized with alternating signs' , i.e. the periodic function represented here...
So your 'intuition' was exact: we have a periodic function  ...
Kind regards
__________________ My new avatar will remain until the sentence of the European Court that removes the crucifix from the italian schools will be revised... | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to chisigma For This Useful Post: | |  | 
November 7th, 2009, 09:12 PM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,239
Country: Thanks: 2,576
Thanked 4,763 Times in 4,195 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by chisigma You are 'lucky' because in this case You don't need to know sophisticated tools like Bromwitch integral, residue theorem and so on but only to have 'little imagination'  ...
The LT to be inverted is...  (1)
Now, taking into account that...
a) for  the function  can be written as...  (2)
b) is...  (3)
... that is the function represented here...
... is easy enough verify with the aid of (2) that the inverse LT we are searching is the function (3) 'periodized with alternating signs' , i.e. the periodic function represented here...
So your 'intuition' was exact: we have a periodic function  ...
Kind regards  | Nice reply. Clearly I have no imagination ....
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
November 8th, 2009, 08:02 AM
| | Super Member | | Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 601
Country: Thanks: 46
Thanked 262 Times in 227 Posts
| | Hi. Just for fun:
and with some effort, we can show a closed contour pinned at the line  and allowed to expand without bounds, reduces to the Bromwich integral and sum of the enclosed residues: 
and I suspect that is the Fourier series of the answer obtained by Chisigma and suggested by Mr. F.
__________________ "I am beset by the ironies in my life"
Last edited by shawsend; November 8th, 2009 at 08:29 AM.
Reason: added +- to residues
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shawsend For This Useful Post: | |  | 
November 8th, 2009, 10:01 AM
|  | Grand Panjandrum | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: South of England
Posts: 11,379
Country: Thanks: 667
Thanked 3,619 Times in 2,916 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by harbottle Hi,
I need to find the inverse Laplace transform of  .
I suspect I have to use the period definition for Laplace transforms but I can't see how to make it fit. Any tips? | You can also look this up in a table of LT and ILT, it is item 32.158 in the Laplace Transform chapter of the Schaum Mathematical Handbook.
(interestingly enough WolframAlpha does not know this!)
CB
__________________ Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.
Giordano Bruno | | The following users thank CaptainBlack for this useful post: | |  | 
November 10th, 2009, 02:06 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 65
Country: Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
| | Nice! That looks easy now with  's hint.
And I'll have a look at your solution too shawsend though as Mr.F suggested I might have some difficulties.
Thanks everyone! | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:54 PM. | | |