Quote:
Originally Posted by bkarpuz Dear friends, I need some help with the existence and/or uniqueness of global solutions to first-order linear differential equations.
For instance, let  and  and consider the following differential equation 
Which theorem ensures existence of global solutions to this initial value problem?
... |
Consider the following initial value problem
![\begin{cases}x^{\prime}(t)=f(t,x(\tau(t))),&t\in[b,c]\\x(t)=\varphi(t),&t\in[a,b],\end{cases}\quad(1) \begin{cases}x^{\prime}(t)=f(t,x(\tau(t))),&t\in[b,c]\\x(t)=\varphi(t),&t\in[a,b],\end{cases}\quad(1)](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/0345e701fb1827fc8896f4be6d2000bd-1.gif)
where
![f:[b,c]\times\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} f:[b,c]\times\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/efa745161042be8f0a9365dbb60d879d-1.gif)
,
![\varphi\in C([a,b],\mathbb{R}) \varphi\in C([a,b],\mathbb{R})](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/b977d78c779096b41e724c8ba1b6abd9-1.gif)
and
![\tau\in C([b,c],[a,c]) \tau\in C([b,c],[a,c])](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/4a7c7d120665d972ab7229dd5ebb2a54-1.gif)
satisfies

for all
![t\in[b,c] t\in[b,c]](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/98f1d29fb5f3701839b26447089495ff-1.gif)
.
Set
![I(\varphi,\varepsilon):=\{x\in\mathbb{R}:x\in B(\varphi(t),\varepsilon)\ \text{for}\ t\in[a,b]\} I(\varphi,\varepsilon):=\{x\in\mathbb{R}:x\in B(\varphi(t),\varepsilon)\ \text{for}\ t\in[a,b]\}](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/ba6af8975699762080cb08fbfe4abf81-1.gif)
, where

.
Theorem 1. Let
![f:[b,c]\times I(\varphi,\varepsilon)\to\mathbb{R} f:[b,c]\times I(\varphi,\varepsilon)\to\mathbb{R}](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/0a95ed95ebd1fc3fabf182f35af43d62-1.gif)
for some

. Assume that there exist

and

such that

for all
![(t,x)\in[b,c]\times I(\varphi,\varepsilon) (t,x)\in[b,c]\times I(\varphi,\varepsilon)](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/84cd36f1ca16800a32bbfe6083c088d2-1.gif)
and

for all
![(t,u),(t,v)\in[b,c]\times I(\varphi,\varepsilon) (t,u),(t,v)\in[b,c]\times I(\varphi,\varepsilon)](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/a6e71a22955be90ba0c31715aea2493e-1.gif)
. Then (1) has a unique solution on
![[a,b+\delta] [a,b+\delta]](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/7acc00cf581be0b5d3827759654f6869-1.gif)
, where

.
Proof. The proof can be given by following exactly the same arguments in
the proof of Picard-Lidelof theorem, and thus omitted here.
Now, consider the following initial value problem
![\begin{cases}x^{\prime}(t)=p(t)x(\tau(t))+q(t),&t\in[b,c]\\x(t)=\varphi(t),&t\in[a,b],\end{cases}\quad(2) \begin{cases}x^{\prime}(t)=p(t)x(\tau(t))+q(t),&t\in[b,c]\\x(t)=\varphi(t),&t\in[a,b],\end{cases}\quad(2)](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/2586cfec78c5f8a891155d8ffed0f757-1.gif)
where
![p,q\in C([b,c],\mathbb{R}) p,q\in C([b,c],\mathbb{R})](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/572f07f1256ffdd42b695fc133b11936-1.gif)
, and the other arguments are same to that of (1).
Corollary 1. (2) admits a unique solution on
![[a,c] [a,c]](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/209f61583177d88b1f24c85f6a43c6ff-1.gif)
.
Proof. Let

for
![(t,u)\in[b,c]\times\mathbb{R} (t,u)\in[b,c]\times\mathbb{R}](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/09ac6e0560267c1263b56183c1468c73-1.gif)
, and

satisfy

and [math]|q(t)|\leq M_{2}[math] for all
![t\in[b,c] t\in[b,c]](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/98f1d29fb5f3701839b26447089495ff-1.gif)
(since

are continuous, we may always find such constants). The Lipschitz condition holds on
![[\xi_{0},\xi_{1}]\times\mathbb{R} [\xi_{0},\xi_{1}]\times\mathbb{R}](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/1b621a995de39d0bd1e981390a25d895-1.gif)
with the Lipschitz constant

. Let

satisfy

for

. For convenience in the notation define

and
![N_{0}:=\max\nolimits_{t\in[a,\xi_{0}]}\{|x_{0}(t)|\} N_{0}:=\max\nolimits_{t\in[a,\xi_{0}]}\{|x_{0}(t)|\}](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/0d1d5bdb10a4398a094d188eb7b06896-1.gif)
. We may pick

such that

, we see that

for all
![(t,u)\in[\xi_{0},\xi_{1}]\times B(0,\varepsilon_{0}+N_{0}) (t,u)\in[\xi_{0},\xi_{1}]\times B(0,\varepsilon_{0}+N_{0})](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/e352d864fd842cac8e5643058daedf0f-1.gif)
. Applying
Theorem 1, we see that
![\begin{cases}x^{\prime}(t)=p(t)x(\tau(t))+q(t),&t\in[\xi_{0},\xi_{1}]\\x(t)=x_{0}(t),&t\in[a,\xi_{0}]\end{cases} \begin{cases}x^{\prime}(t)=p(t)x(\tau(t))+q(t),&t\in[\xi_{0},\xi_{1}]\\x(t)=x_{0}(t),&t\in[a,\xi_{0}]\end{cases}](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/3adcbadadefb94f26baffdf29cb6d16f-1.gif)
admits a unique solution

on
![[a,\xi_{1}] [a,\xi_{1}]](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/1f743c522fa04a466550d91bed5ddfb1-1.gif)
since

. Next, let
![N_{1}:=\max\nolimits_{t\in[a,\xi_{1}]}\{|x_{1}(t)|\} N_{1}:=\max\nolimits_{t\in[a,\xi_{1}]}\{|x_{1}(t)|\}](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/6f3ffd8e2b0615ce28a676622cc305a1-1.gif)
. We may find

such that

. And we have

for all
![(t,u)\in[\xi_{1},\xi_{2}]\times B(0,\varepsilon_{1}+N_{1}) (t,u)\in[\xi_{1},\xi_{2}]\times B(0,\varepsilon_{1}+N_{1})](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/2c86c654b290c732fcfd71f0f04105a4-1.gif)
. Applying
Theorem 1, we see that
![\begin{cases}x^{\prime}(t)=p(t)x(\tau(t))+q(t),&t\in[\xi_{1},\xi_{2}]\\x(t)=x_{1}(t),&t\in[a,\xi_{1}]\end{cases} \begin{cases}x^{\prime}(t)=p(t)x(\tau(t))+q(t),&t\in[\xi_{1},\xi_{2}]\\x(t)=x_{1}(t),&t\in[a,\xi_{1}]\end{cases}](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/67b430e950cb6b6e15053ecf359cbf6e-1.gif)
admits a unique solution

on
![[a,\xi_{2}] [a,\xi_{2}]](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/13e0b65f51eac54d5a129588a652cfcc-1.gif)
. Repeating in this manner, we obtain the unique solution

of (2) on
![[a,c] [a,c]](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/209f61583177d88b1f24c85f6a43c6ff-1.gif)
.
Remark 1. If we need to obtain the unique global solution to
![\begin{cases}x^{\prime}(t)=p(t)x(\tau(t))+q(t),&t\in[b,\infty)\\x(t)=\varphi(t),&t\in[a,b],\end{cases}\quad(3) \begin{cases}x^{\prime}(t)=p(t)x(\tau(t))+q(t),&t\in[b,\infty)\\x(t)=\varphi(t),&t\in[a,b],\end{cases}\quad(3)](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/f07d5cc5f197180bd23d8344687ae2f7-1.gif)
where in addition

is assumed to hold, we may pick an increasing divergent sequence

with the convenience

and

such that

for all

, and apply
Corollary 1 successively to obtain the unique solution

on each of the intervals
![[\xi_{k-1},\xi_{k}] [\xi_{k-1},\xi_{k}]](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/4807dd5b6b7a267b1e445818bcc81518-1.gif)
for

by assuming the solution

obtained in the previous step as the initial function on the current interval with the convenience

. Then, letting

for
![t\in[\xi_{k-1},\xi_{k}] t\in[\xi_{k-1},\xi_{k}]](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/e29186c12aa936220a001f624ab357ff-1.gif)
for

, we obtain the unique global solution to (3).
Appendix. It is clear that the function

as

for any fixed

.
Remark. The proof is very simple in the case

.
proof by bkarpuz