Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > University Math Help > Discrete Mathematics, Set Theory and Logic
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 1st, 2009, 01:43 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 23
Thanks: 9
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
mathgirlie is on a distinguished road
Default Line graph proof

Let G be a non-empty graph of order n whose vertices have degrees (d1, . . . , dn) Provethat the size of L(G) is:
SUM(d_i choose 2)

Alright, this is what I tried so far:

Let G be a nonempty graph of order n whose vertices have deg(d_1...d_n).
By theorem that means that the size of G= (1/2)SUM(d_i)

By definition of the line graph, that means that order of L(G)=size G, and therefore,

order of L(G)= (1/2)SUM(d_i)

This is where I get stuck, by definition of the line graph, two vertices of L(G) have an edge between them if they share an endpoint in G. I understand the concept, but I really don't know how to write it out in my proof. I see that the of a vertex (lets say v1) is equal to the number of verticies in L(G) and we choose two of those verticies to draw an edge between in L(G) so that means that the number of edges in L(G) for v1=(deg(v1) choose 2). What would be a more formal way of writing that out?

Any tips would be great!
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old November 2nd, 2009, 03:12 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
gmatt is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathgirlie View Post
Let G be a non-empty graph of order n whose vertices have degrees (d1, . . . , dn) Provethat the size of L(G) is:
SUM(d_i choose 2)

Alright, this is what I tried so far:

Let G be a nonempty graph of order n whose vertices have deg(d_1...d_n).
By theorem that means that the size of G= (1/2)SUM(d_i)

By definition of the line graph, that means that order of L(G)=size G, and therefore,

order of L(G)= (1/2)SUM(d_i)

This is where I get stuck, by definition of the line graph, two vertices of L(G) have an edge between them if they share an endpoint in G. I understand the concept, but I really don't know how to write it out in my proof. I see that the of a vertex (lets say v1) is equal to the number of verticies in L(G) and we choose two of those verticies to draw an edge between in L(G) so that means that the number of edges in L(G) for v1=(deg(v1) choose 2). What would be a more formal way of writing that out?

Any tips would be great!

Define E_ {v_i} = \{(v_i, u)  \in E\} and define E' the set of edges in L(G). Define E'_{v_i} = \{ (e_1, e_2) \in E' : e_1 \in E_{v_i} \text{ or } e_2 \in E_{v_i}\}. You need to show that E'_{v} \cap E'_{u} = \emptyset whenever u \neq v with u,v\in V. Then it follows that \bigcup_i E'_{v_i} = E' (because the E_{v_i}'s are equivalence classes) and all that remains to prove to show your result is that \left| E'_{v_i} \right| =  \binom {deg(v_i)}{2}.

My advice is never take anything from granted in math. If you're at a point where you think its obvious but you don't know quite how to prove it, it most likely is NOT obvious and there is a subtlety that you need to iron out. At that point its most likely your intuition and as my first year math prof always said, your intution is correct only about half the time.
Reply With Quote
The following users thank gmatt for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
  #3  
Old November 2nd, 2009, 07:49 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 23
Thanks: 9
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
mathgirlie is on a distinguished road
Default

So are you saying that E_vi is the set of edges in the original graph?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 2nd, 2009, 09:22 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
gmatt is on a distinguished road
Default

Here I'm using the notation that G=(V,E) and L(G)=(V',E') and the E_v_i's are subsets of E that have v_i as a terminating node, and the E'_v_i 's are special subsets of E'.


Basically, what I'm doing is parititioning the edges in the line graph L(G) into disjoint subsets E'_v_i where each subset is defined to be the set of edges IN the LINE GRAPH such that they share the common vertex v_i in the original graph. If two edges share more than one vertex v_i then they are necessarily the same edge (because this is an undirected graph.) Once you have partitioned it into disjoint sets you just have to show that the size of each one of these sets is binom(deg(v_i), 2).

Last edited by gmatt; November 2nd, 2009 at 09:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.