Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > University Math Help > Discrete Mathematics, Set Theory and Logic
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 18th, 2009, 06:02 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21
Country:
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
alexandros is on a distinguished road
Default analysis of a proof

for the following proof :

ab\leq |ab|\Longrightarrow 2ab\leq 2|a||b|\Longrightarrow (a+b)^2\leq (|a|+|b|)^2 \Longrightarrow |a+b|\leq |a|+|b|

Write the theorems involved in the proof and how are they involved
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old November 18th, 2009, 07:45 PM
Focus's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 141
Thanks: 0
Thanked 51 Times in 51 Posts
Focus will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexandros View Post
for the following proof :

ab\leq |ab|\Longrightarrow 2ab\leq 2|a||b|\Longrightarrow (a+b)^2\leq (|a|+|b|)^2 \Longrightarrow |a+b|\leq |a|+|b|

Write the theorems involved in the proof and how are they involved
I am not quite sure what you are asking. The first statement holds by definition, second one by Cauchy-Schwarz, third by squaring out and using the inequality, last one by taking square roots.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 19th, 2009, 06:18 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21
Country:
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
alexandros is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Focus View Post
I am not quite sure what you are asking. The first statement holds by definition, second one by Cauchy-Schwarz, third by squaring out and using the inequality, last one by taking square roots.
Thank you.

The Nos are Real Nos and not vectors and i was asked to mention the theorems involved in each step of the proof ( like you did ) and then to show
how are they involved in the proof
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 19th, 2009, 09:56 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 324
Country:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 91 Times in 91 Posts
emakarov will become famous soon enoughemakarov will become famous soon enough
Default

(Read the note in the end.)

This seems like a nice exercise. Obviously, the reasoning displayed uses several things: (1) properties of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division; (2) properties of inequalities; (3) properties of the |\cdot| function; and (4) possibly some other properties, like those of square root, etc.

Imagine that you are talking to a elementary-school student who is extremely smart and understands everything you say provided you explain every new concept. However, he/she knows only the properties of the four basic operations and inequalities, as well as the definition of the absolute value. As I understand, first you are supposed to write this reasoning in much finer detail, on the level something like: "Now add ... to both sides of inequality. Now move this term to the other side. Now use the formula for the expansion of the square of a sum". Then you have to note every place that the young student won't understand without more explanation. For example, you replace |ab| with |a|\cdot|b| because you claim they are equal. This is not a property of the basic operations or inequalities; it involves some reasoning (very simple) about |\cdot|. So you have to identify all such places and write the statements that you use, such as |ab|=|a|\cdot|b|.

Note: this is my interpretation of the problem. You may have recently studied concrete properties or theorems, to which you gave names, etc. Then maybe the professor wants you to identify those facts only.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old November 19th, 2009, 04:43 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21
Country:
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
alexandros is on a distinguished road
Default

Thank you.

I asked my professor and he said for the first step of the implication i.e

ab\leq |ab| we use the theorem :

for all x : -|x|\leq x\leq |x|.

But how do we use that thyeorem to get :ab\leq |ab|??
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old November 19th, 2009, 04:55 PM
Focus's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 141
Thanks: 0
Thanked 51 Times in 51 Posts
Focus will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexandros View Post
Thank you.

I asked my professor and he said for the first step of the implication i.e

ab\leq |ab| we use the theorem :

for all x : -|x|\leq x\leq |x|.

But how do we use that thyeorem to get :ab\leq |ab|??
Hint, x\leq |x|.

P.S. Cauchy-Schwarz still applies as multiplication in R^1 is an inner product.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old November 19th, 2009, 04:55 PM
MHF Contributor

 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,613
Thanks: 88
Thanked 2,824 Times in 2,591 Posts
Plato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexandros View Post
Thank you.

I asked my professor and he said for the first step of the implication i.e

ab\leq |ab| we use the theorem :

for all x : -|x|\leq x\leq |x|.

But how do we use that theorem to get :ab\leq |ab|??
If you know that \left( {\forall x} \right)\left[ { - \left| x \right| \leqslant \color{blue}x \leqslant \left| x \right|} \right]
then surely it follows that \color{blue}ab \leqslant \left| ab \right|
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old November 19th, 2009, 05:38 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 232
Country:
Thanks: 13
Thanked 57 Times in 56 Posts
xalk will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Plato View Post
If you know that \left( {\forall x} \right)\left[ { - \left| x \right| \leqslant \color{blue}x \leqslant \left| x \right|} \right]
then surely it follows that \color{blue}ab \leqslant \left| ab \right|
How ,by putting x= ab?

By what theorem are you allowed to do this?

And again by what theorem you get :ab\leq |ab| from

-|ab|\leq ab\leq |ab|
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old November 19th, 2009, 06:16 PM
MHF Contributor

 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,613
Thanks: 88
Thanked 2,824 Times in 2,591 Posts
Plato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xalk View Post
How ,by putting x= ab?
By what theorem are you allowed to do this?
And again by what theorem you get :ab\leq |ab| from
-|ab|\leq ab\leq |ab|
What is your point?
Surely you understand that ab is a real number?
If not, why are you posting at this level?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old November 20th, 2009, 01:39 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21
Country:
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
alexandros is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Plato View Post
If you know that \left( {\forall x} \right)\left[ { - \left| x \right| \leqslant \color{blue}x \leqslant \left| x \right|} \right]
then surely it follows that \color{blue}ab \leqslant \left| ab \right|

Thank you ,can you help me with the rest of the problem ?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old November 20th, 2009, 02:12 PM
MHF Contributor

 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,613
Thanks: 88
Thanked 2,824 Times in 2,591 Posts
Plato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexandros View Post
for the following proof :

ab\leq |ab|\Longrightarrow 2ab\leq 2|a||b|\Longrightarrow (a+b)^2\leq (|a|+|b|)^2 \Longrightarrow |a+b|\leq |a|+|b|

Write the theorems involved in the proof and how are they involved
Comming late to this thread, I don't know if this will help.
Here facts we have now.
a^2=|a|^2,~b^2=|b|^2~\&~2ab\le 2|a||b|.

a^2+2ab+b^2\le |a|^2 +2|a||b|+|b|^2

(a+b)^2\le (|a|+|b|)^2
Reply With Quote
The following users thank Plato for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
  #12  
Old November 20th, 2009, 04:05 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21
Country:
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
alexandros is on a distinguished road
Default

Thank you ,first of all ,before we go any further, how do we know that this proof is correct
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old November 20th, 2009, 04:20 PM
MHF Contributor

 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,613
Thanks: 88
Thanked 2,824 Times in 2,591 Posts
Plato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond reputePlato has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexandros View Post
How do we know that this proof is correct?
Well it certainly is fairly standard.
What it does is to prove the triangle inequality.
We start very basic properties of the distance function (the metric, the absolute value) and then using basic properties of order we prove the triangle inequality.
This basic form of the proof is used in a variety of different courses.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old November 20th, 2009, 04:22 PM
Drexel28's Avatar
MHF Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,776
Country:
Thanks: 71
Thanked 518 Times in 481 Posts
Drexel28 is a glorious beacon of lightDrexel28 is a glorious beacon of lightDrexel28 is a glorious beacon of lightDrexel28 is a glorious beacon of lightDrexel28 is a glorious beacon of lightDrexel28 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexandros View Post
Thank you ,first of all ,before we go any further, how do we know that this proof is correct
What class are you in?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old November 20th, 2009, 05:03 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 232
Country:
Thanks: 13
Thanked 57 Times in 56 Posts
xalk will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drexel28 View Post
What class are you in?
He is a bit confused but the problem is quite complicated
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.