Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > University Math Help > Discrete Mathematics, Set Theory and Logic
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old July 11th, 2007, 09:17 AM
topsquark's Avatar
Generous Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 7,605
Country:
Thanks: 643
Thanked 2,305 Times in 2,093 Posts
topsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by emily28 View Post
i dont that i was meant to look at particular solutions and expenituals, is there another way to do it using perhaps a different method, as i havent covered this in class and dont think the teacher would want me to approach it this way?
Probably Jhevon's integrating factor approach would be the best then.

-Dan
__________________
Got a Physics question? Come on over to
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
 
  #17  
Old July 11th, 2007, 10:16 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 24
Country:
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
emily28 is on a distinguished road
Default

done a little on using the intergrating factor, but how would be the best way to get the formula into a form to use the intergrating formula?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old July 11th, 2007, 01:34 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 24
Country:
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
emily28 is on a distinguished road
Default

does anyone have any suggestions/
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old July 11th, 2007, 01:38 PM
Krizalid's Avatar
Math Engineering Student

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santiago
Posts: 3,027
Country:
Thanks: 82
Thanked 1,350 Times in 1,077 Posts
Krizalid has a brilliant futureKrizalid has a brilliant futureKrizalid has a brilliant futureKrizalid has a brilliant futureKrizalid has a brilliant futureKrizalid has a brilliant futureKrizalid has a brilliant futureKrizalid has a brilliant futureKrizalid has a brilliant futureKrizalid has a brilliant futureKrizalid has a brilliant future
Send a message via MSN to Krizalid
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by emily28 View Post
\frac{du}{dx} + 4 u = -4x
Find an integrating factor defined by

\mu(x)=\exp\left(4\int~dx\right)
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  • Wanna type math symbols? You do need to download
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    .
  • Got trouble with LaTeX?
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    .
  • Make your partial integration (aka integration by parts) faster. Click
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    .
  • How to prove limits by the
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    .
  • How to apply the
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    .
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old July 11th, 2007, 02:30 PM
topsquark's Avatar
Generous Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 7,605
Country:
Thanks: 643
Thanked 2,305 Times in 2,093 Posts
topsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by emily28 View Post
does anyone have any suggestions/
See here.

-Dan
__________________
Got a Physics question? Come on over to
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old July 11th, 2007, 09:00 PM
Jhevon's Avatar
vs Jhevon
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 11,044
Country:
Thanks: 2,607
Thanked 4,261 Times in 3,960 Posts
Jhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by emily28 View Post
does anyone have any suggestions/
I will say what Krizalid said, but in a more general way.

For a differential equation of the form: y' + p(x)y = f(x)

we define \mu (x) = e^{\int p(x)~dx} = \mbox { exp} \left( \int p(x)~dx \right) as the integrating factor of the differential equation. We solve the differential equation by multiplying through by the integrating factor. so we get the new equation:

\mu (x) y' + \mu (x) p(x) y = \mu (x) f(x)

it will always be the case that the left hand side is the derivative we would get from applying the product rule. so the equation becomes:

\left( \mu (x) y \right)' = \mu (x) f(x)

\Rightarrow \mu (x) y = \int \mu (x) f(x)~dx

\Rightarrow y = \frac { \int \mu (x) f(x) ~dx}{ \mu (x)} is our solution

remember that you will get an arbitrary constant from the integration, you have to divide this by \mu (x) as well
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old July 12th, 2007, 04:55 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 24
Country:
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
emily28 is on a distinguished road
Default

after doing some reading on intergrating factors, from



ive used the intergrating factor, whereby f(x) = -4x and a(x) = 4

so g(x)= exp^(intergral of 4 dx)

so g(x) = e^{4x}

now using the formula y= 1/g(x).[intergral of f(x)g(x) dx]

so y=1/e^{4x} [intergral  -4xe^{4x}]

is this correct and how would i carry on from this?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old July 12th, 2007, 10:35 AM
Jhevon's Avatar
vs Jhevon
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 11,044
Country:
Thanks: 2,607
Thanked 4,261 Times in 3,960 Posts
Jhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by emily28 View Post
after doing some reading on intergrating factors, from



ive used the intergrating factor, whereby f(x) = -4x and a(x) = 4

so g(x)= exp^(intergral of 4 dx)

so g(x) = e^{4x}

now using the formula y= 1/g(x).[intergral of f(x)g(x) dx]

so y=1/e^{4x} [intergral  -4xe^{4x}]

is this correct and how would i carry on from this?
yes, that is fine, and incidentally, that is exactly the process i described to you above. i tried to save you the trouble of trying to get it from you text book, sometimes those things are ... let's just say, I hate the text that i used for differential equations. the only thing i like about it is that it gives the answers for even as well as odd problems, which is rare for textbooks to do
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.