Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > University Math Help > Discrete Mathematics, Set Theory and Logic
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 11th, 2009, 08:37 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 67
Country:
Thanks: 13
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
spearfish is on a distinguished road
Default Equivalence Relations - I am stuck, help!

Hey all,

I am getting stuck proving the following relation:

x, y are elements of Q^+. x~y iff x = y(2^n) for some integer n.

Here's what I have so far:

Reflexive:
Let x be an element in Q^+.
x = x(2^n).
x/x = 2^n
1 = 2^n
1 = 2^0
1 = 1, Ok so does this prove xRx or do I need further work?

Symmetric:
Let x,y be elements in Q+.
Suppose xRy.
x = y(2^n)
Now suppose yRx.
y = x(2^m)
Plugging in for y and solving for x, I get
x = (x(2^n))(2^m)
x = x(2^n+m)
x/x = 2^(n+m), This is what I don't know what to do. What exactly does this result tell me? Do I need further work, or is this completely the wrong approach? Please somebody.

Transitive:
Let x,y,z be elements in Q+
Suppose xRy.
x = y(2^n)
Suppose yRz.
y = z(2^m).
Pluggin in and solving.
x = (z(2^m))(2^n)
x = z(2^m+n), Once again, now what?

Please explain my faults and show how to correct. Explanations would be very helpful. Thanks
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old April 11th, 2009, 08:52 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 43
Country:
Thanks: 5
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
K A D C Dilshan is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by spearfish View Post
Hey all,

I am getting stuck proving the following relation:

x, y are elements of Q^+. x~y iff x = y(2^n) for some integer n.

Here's what I have so far:

Reflexive:
Let x be an element in Q^+.
x = x(2^n).
x/x = 2^n
1 = 2^n
1 = 2^0
1 = 1, Ok so does this prove xRx or do I need further work?

Symmetric:
Let x,y be elements in Q+.
Suppose xRy.
x = y(2^n)
Now suppose yRx.
y = x(2^m)
Plugging in for y and solving for x, I get
x = (x(2^n))(2^m)
x = x(2^n+m)
x/x = 2^(n+m),
This is what I don't know what to do. What exactly does this result tell me? Do I need further work, or is this completely the wrong approach? Please somebody.

Transitive:
Let x,y,z be elements in Q+
Suppose xRy.
x = y(2^n)
Suppose yRz.
y = z(2^m).
Pluggin in and solving.
x = (z(2^m))(2^n)
x = z(2^m+n), Once again, now what?

Please explain my faults and show how to correct. Explanations would be very helpful. Thanks
Actually what you have done to prove reflexive and transient property of R is correct ,
But you have made a mistake on the proof of symmetric property of R .
You have taken that if (x,y) belongs to R x = y (2^n) , y = x (2^m)
Mistake is there
if (x,y) belongs to R x = y (2^n) ,
y = x (2^-n) we know that -n is also an Integer
therefore R is symmetric .
Reply With Quote
The following users thank K A D C Dilshan for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
  #3  
Old April 11th, 2009, 08:58 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 67
Country:
Thanks: 13
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
spearfish is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks a bunch for the help.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
discrete math, login, set theory

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.