Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > University Math Help > Linear and Abstract Algebra
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 2nd, 2009, 08:11 AM
Swlabr's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 272
Country:
Thanks: 28
Thanked 75 Times in 69 Posts
Swlabr will become famous soon enough
Default Non-Abelian Simple Groups

I was wondering - A_5 is the only non-abelian simple group of order less than 100. What is the next one along? I know there is one of order somewhere in the region of 168 (the Projective Special Linear Group PSL_2(7)), but is there any of order between these two?
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old November 2nd, 2009, 08:42 AM
MHF Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,219
Thanks: 55
Thanked 424 Times in 401 Posts
tonio is just really nicetonio is just really nicetonio is just really nicetonio is just really nicetonio is just really nice
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swlabr View Post
I was wondering - A_5 is the only non-abelian simple group of order less than 100. What is the next one along? I know there is one of order somewhere in the region of 168 (the Projective Special Linear Group PSL_2(7)), but is there any of order between these two?
\

No, there isn't...non-abelian, that is.

Tonio
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 2nd, 2009, 09:05 AM
Swlabr's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 272
Country:
Thanks: 28
Thanked 75 Times in 69 Posts
Swlabr will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tonio View Post
\

No, there isn't...non-abelian, that is.

Tonio
Okay, but why? The problem cases that I can see are groups of order p^2qr and p^3qr (120 is the only number of this form in our range though, and 168 is of this form). As 60=2^2.3.5, we cannot slap a general condition on groups of these orders not being non-simple, as we can with the other orders.

So, I have become a tad stumped as to why this is...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 3rd, 2009, 09:31 PM
NonCommAlg's Avatar
MHF Contributor

 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,767
Country:
Thanks: 212
Thanked 1,289 Times in 959 Posts
NonCommAlg has much to be proud ofNonCommAlg has much to be proud ofNonCommAlg has much to be proud ofNonCommAlg has much to be proud ofNonCommAlg has much to be proud ofNonCommAlg has much to be proud ofNonCommAlg has much to be proud ofNonCommAlg has much to be proud ofNonCommAlg has much to be proud ofNonCommAlg has much to be proud of
Default

a useful and easy-to-prove fact is that if 2 < |G| \equiv 2 \mod 4, then G is not simple. see Tough Problem from Rotman's Group Theory, 3rd Ed for a proof of a more general result.
__________________
There's more than one of everything.
Reply With Quote
The following users thank NonCommAlg for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.