| 
November 3rd, 2009, 01:08 AM
| | Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 153
Country: Thanks: 30
Thanked 35 Times in 33 Posts
| | Kernel and Image? This question seems to be so basic that I can't find it anywhere... My grasp of linear algebra is embarrassing, and I'm working to remedy that, but I need this to produce something fairly sharpish...
Basically what I need is
the Kernel of, say, and how one gets it
and the Image of
I need it to calculate the homology, ie. using Ker i / Im j
Many thanks... | 
November 3rd, 2009, 06:26 AM
| | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 328
Thanked 1,214 Times in 1,115 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Unenlightened This question seems to be so basic that I can't find it anywhere... My grasp of linear algebra is embarrassing, and I'm working to remedy that, but I need this to produce something fairly sharpish...
Basically what I need is
the Kernel of, say, and how one gets it  | The definition of the "kernel" of the linear transformation, A, is "the space of all vectors, v, such that Av= 0.
Here , that means you are looking for <a, b, c, d> such that 
That gives you the equations -a+ d= 0, a- b= 0, -a+ c= 0, b- d= 0, and -b+ c= 0. Those do not have a single solution (if they did it would have to be a= b= c= d= 0) but can be solved for b, c, and d in terms of a. That gives a single vector basis for the kernel. Quote:
and the Image of [/math]
| Again, use the definition of "Image". The image of linear transformation, A, is the set of all vectors, v, such that Au= v for [b]some[\b] vector u. In other words, that would be the set of all v such that Au= v has a solution. If we let  then we are looking at the equation  .
You can "solve" that by row reduction of the augmented matrix 
If there are any rows in which the first 6 terms are all 0, then the last term, which must be in terms of a, b, c, and d, must also be 0. That gives the equations you need to find the image. If there are no rows in which the first 6 numbers are 0, the kernel is all of  . Quote:
I need it to calculate the homology, ie. using Ker i / Im j
Many thanks...
| | | The following users thank HallsofIvy for this useful post: | |  | 
November 3rd, 2009, 01:04 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 153
Country: Thanks: 30
Thanked 35 Times in 33 Posts
| | So for the kernel a=b=c=d, so the basis is (1, 1, 1, 1) ?
The augmented matirx reduces to
1 0 -1 0 -1 0 b
0 1 1 0 0 -1 c
0 0 0 1 1 1 d
0 0 0 0 0 0 a+b+c+d
...how does this give me the equations I need to find the image? | 
November 3rd, 2009, 06:46 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 80
Country: Thanks: 1
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
| | generally, steps of calculating kernel & image are getting rref(matrix) at first Image: ![rref\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} -1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\1 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\-1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\0 & 1 & 0 & -1 \\0 & 0 & -1 & 1 \\0 & -1 & 1 & 0 \end{array} \right]=\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right] rref\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} -1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\1 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\-1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\0 & 1 & 0 & -1 \\0 & 0 & -1 & 1 \\0 & -1 & 1 & 0 \end{array} \right]=\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right]](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/00d58204531bcc15452f78ffad14ceb3-1.gif)
find columns including leading 1's in rref(matrix), these columns are linearly independent. Kernel:
Obviously, there are only 3 columns which are linearly independent.
The remainder 3 columns will spanned by linearly independent columns.
find another 2 vectors by the same method,
Last edited by math2009; November 3rd, 2009 at 07:30 PM.
| | The following users thank math2009 for this useful post: | |  | 
November 3rd, 2009, 08:02 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 153
Country: Thanks: 30
Thanked 35 Times in 33 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by math2009 The remainder 3 columns will spanned by linearly independent columns. ![\vec{v}_3=-\vec{v}_1+\vec{v}_2 \longrightarrow \vec{v}_1-\vec{v}_2+\vec{v}_3=0 \longrightarrow A\left[ \begin{array}{cccccc} 1\\-1\\1\\0\\0\\0 \end{array} \right]=0 \vec{v}_3=-\vec{v}_1+\vec{v}_2 \longrightarrow \vec{v}_1-\vec{v}_2+\vec{v}_3=0 \longrightarrow A\left[ \begin{array}{cccccc} 1\\-1\\1\\0\\0\\0 \end{array} \right]=0](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/0ac4b0b7fceb3c192b391d151aafb88c-1.gif) | I'm sorry, I can't see where you got that v_3 = -v_1 + v_2 from... | 
November 3rd, 2009, 08:07 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 80
Country: Thanks: 1
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
| |  represent rref(matrix) column | 
November 4th, 2009, 01:26 AM
| | Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 153
Country: Thanks: 30
Thanked 35 Times in 33 Posts
| | So
v_1 = (1 0 0 0) (transposed - it's easier to write like this)
v_2 = (0 1 0 0)
v_3 = (-1 1 0 0) or (0 0 1 0) ? Either way, I don't see where you get the v_3 = -v_1 + v_2 from | 
November 4th, 2009, 03:42 AM
| | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 328
Thanked 1,214 Times in 1,115 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Unenlightened So for the kernel a=b=c=d, so the basis is (1, 1, 1, 1) ? | Yes, that is correct. Quote:
The augmented matirx reduces to
1 0 -1 0 -1 0 b
0 1 1 0 0 -1 c
0 0 0 1 1 1 d
0 0 0 0 0 0 a+b+c+d
...how does this give me the equations I need to find the image?
| The last row corresponds to an equation like 0x+ 0y+ 0z+ 0u+ 0v+ 0w= a+b+c+d. That is only possible, as I said before, if the entire row is 0: that is, if a+ b+ c+ d= 0. That reduces to, say, a= - b- c- d so any such vector is of the form <-b-c-d, b, c, d>= b<-1, 1, 0, 0>+ c<-1, 0, 1, 0>+ d<-1, 0, 0, 1>. | | The following users thank HallsofIvy for this useful post: | |  | 
November 4th, 2009, 04:03 AM
| | Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 153
Country: Thanks: 30
Thanked 35 Times in 33 Posts
| | So the homology = Ker/Im gives me  ...?
Given that it's homology I'm looking for, this answer should be an integer or group... have I gone wrong somewhere, or is there some way to solve this fraction that I'm not seeing? (Neither of which would surprise me very much  ) | 
November 4th, 2009, 08:58 AM
| | Member | | Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 110
Country: Thanks: 18
Thanked 26 Times in 26 Posts
| | Sorry about bringing up another question in this thread. Quote:
generally, steps of calculating kernel & image are getting rref(matrix) at first
Image: ![rref\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} -1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\1 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\-1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\0 & 1 & 0 & -1 \\0 & 0 & -1 & 1 \\0 & -1 & 1 & 0 \end{array} \right]=\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right] rref\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} -1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\1 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\-1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\0 & 1 & 0 & -1 \\0 & 0 & -1 & 1 \\0 & -1 & 1 & 0 \end{array} \right]=\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right]](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/a5b242c36e1cc0423fce7662653f4915-1.gif)
find columns including leading 1's in rref(matrix), these columns are linearly independent.
im(A)=span(column1, \cdots , column4)
| I wanted to ask about this. When you find rref(matrix) you generally change the column space but not the row space.
The image is the span of the original columns. So would you not have to use gauss method on (matrix)' <--- (supposed to mean transpose)
and then the image is the row space of rref((matrix)') ? | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:12 AM. | | |